Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34629980›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2021

Piloting a long-term evaluation of library data workshops.

Fred Willie Zametkin LaPolla, Nicole Contaxis, Alisa Surkis

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rigor and reproducibility instruction in academic medical libraries.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fred Willie Zametkin LaPollafred.lapolla@med.nyu.edu, Knowledge Management Librarian at the NYU Health Sciences Library, Data Services team, liaison to General Internal Medicine and Radiology, NYU Health Sciences Library, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3185-9753
Nicole Contaxisnicole.contaxis@nyulangone.org, NYU Health Sciences Library, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-5279-1623
Alisa Surkisalisa.surkis@nyulangone.org, NYU Health Sciences Library, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-9777-2693
New York Public Library · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver four years of hosting library data workshops, we conducted post-workshop evaluation of attendees' satisfaction with the workshops but not longer-term follow-up. To best allocate library resources and most effectively serve the needs of our users, we sought to determine whether our data workshops were impactful and useful to our community. This paper describes a pilot project to evaluate the impact of data workshops at our academic health sciences library. CASE PRESENTATION: We surveyed individuals who signed up for data workshops between 2016 and 2019. Surveys included open-ended and multiple-choice questions, with the goal of having participants describe their motivations for taking the workshop(s) and how they ultimately used what they learned. An analysis of responses using the Applied Thematic Analysis model indicated that the workshops had an impact on the respondents, although the strength of our conclusions is limited by a relatively low response rate.

conclusionsSurvey results indicated that our workshops impacted how researchers at our medical center collect and analyze data, supporting the conclusion that we should concentrate our educational efforts on providing skills-based workshops. The low response rate and time-consuming nature of the analysis point toward several improvements for future evaluation efforts, including better tracking of workshop attendees, a shorter survey with fewer open-ended questions, and survey implementation within one year of the workshop date.

Indexed as

Libraries, MedicalResearch PersonnelEducational StatusHumansPilot Projectsdata educationdata sciencelibrary evaluationlibrary workshops

Identifiers

PMID34629980
PMCPMC8485943
OpenAlexW3202149071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.