Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34629964›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2021

Library involvement in health informatics education for health professions students and practitioners: a scoping review.

Deborah L Lauseng, Kristine M Alpi, Brenda M Linares, Elaine Sullo, Megan von Isenburg

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Brenda Linares, MLIS, MBA, AHIP, Medical Library Association President, 2024-2025.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Health sciences librarians' instructional engagement in continuing education: a scoping review.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deborah L Lausengdlauseng@uic.edu, Regional Head Librarian & Assistant Professor, Library of the Health Sciences-Peoria, University of Illinois Chicago, Peoria, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-9067-2932
Kristine M Alpikrisalpi@gmail.com, University Librarian, OHSU Library, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.ORCID 0000-0002-4521-3523
Brenda M Linaresblinares@kumc.edu, School of Nursing Librarian, A. R. Dykes Library, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.ORCID 0000-0002-9394-4531
Elaine Sulloelainej@gwu.edu, Associate Director, Reference and Instruction, Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library, George Washington University, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0002-8847-4862
Megan von Isenburgmegan.vonisenburg@duke.edu, Associate Dean, Library Services & Archives, Medical Center Library & Archives, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-6084-5775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this scoping review is to evaluate the extent of library or librarian involvement in informatics education in the health domain.

methodsWe searched eight databases from their inception to 2019 for reports of informatics educational activities for health professionals or health professions students that involved library staff or resources. Two reviewers independently screened all titles/abstracts (n=2,196) and resolved inclusion decisions by consensus. From the full text of the 36 papers that met the inclusion criteria, we extracted data on 41 educational activities.

resultsThe most frequent coded purposes of activities were "teaching clinical tools" (n=19, 46.3%) and "technology" (n=17; 41.5%). Medical students were the most frequent primary audience (34.1%), though 41.5% of activities had multiple audiences. Evaluation was reported for 24 activities (58.5%), only a few of which assessed short or post-activity impact on attitudes, knowledge, or skills. The most common long-term outcome was applying skills in other courses or clinical experiences. Thematic analysis yielded three areas of outcomes and issues for the library and organizational partners: expanded opportunities, technology and resource issues, and value demonstration.

conclusionsLimited published examples of health informatics educational activities provide models for library roles in informatics education. More librarians should report on their informatics educational activities and provide sufficient details on the interventions and their evaluation. This would strengthen the evidence base about the potential impact of libraries within informatics education.

Indexed as

LibrariansMedical InformaticsStudents, Health OccupationsHealth OccupationsHealth PersonnelHumanseducational serviceshealth sciences librariesinformatics educationlibrarian-educators

Identifiers

PMID34629964
PMCPMC8485947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.