Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34629706›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2021

Standard Radiation Dosimetry Models: What Interventional Radiologists Need to Know.

Linzi Arndt Webster, Alexander Villalobos, Bill S Majdalany, Zachary L Bercu, Ripal T Gandhi, Nima Kokabi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linzi Arndt WebsterDivision of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Alexander VillalobosDivision of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Bill S MajdalanyDivision of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Zachary L BercuDivision of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ripal T GandhiMiami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL.
Nima KokabiDivision of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Emory University · USThe Cardiac and Vascular Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thoughtful and accurate dosimetry is critical to obtain the safest and most efficacious yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers. Three dosimetry models are currently used in clinical practice, namely, body surface area model, medical internal radiation dose model, and the partition model. The objective of this review is to briefly outline the history behind Y90 dosimetry and the difference between the aforementioned models. When applying these three models to a single case, the differences between them are further demonstrated. Each dosimetry model in clinical practice has its own benefits and limitations. Therefore, it is incumbent upon practicing interventional radiologists to be aware of these differences to optimize treatment outcomes for their patients.

Indexed as

BSA modelDosimetryMIRD modelPartition ModelRadioembolizationY90Yttrium-90

Identifiers

PMID34629706
PMCPMC8497093
OpenAlexW3202369552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.