Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34629684›Full record

ArticleResources policy2021

Modelling the heterogeneous relationship between the crude oil implied volatility index and African stocks in the coronavirus pandemic.

Ebenezer Boateng, Anokye M Adam, Peterson Owusu Junior

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resources policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ebenezer BoatengDepartment of Finance, School of Business, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Anokye M AdamDepartment of Finance, School of Business, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Peterson Owusu JuniorDepartment of Finance, School of Business, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
University of Cape Coast · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper revisited the crude oil - stock market nexus to examine how the oil implied volatility index (a forward-looking and more accurate measure for uncertainty in oil prices) affects stock returns in major Africa's oil-importing (South Africa, Kenya, Mauritius, and Botswana) and oil-exporting (Nigeria, Egypt, Tunisia, and Morocco) countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Quantile regression is employed to examine the heterogeneous relationship at different distributions of stock returns. The study documents evidence to support a negative relationship between the oil implied volatility shocks and stock returns in the selected stock markets, especially in downturns. Findings from this study also reveal that the oil implied volatility shocks can asymmetrically influence Africa's stocks. Specifically, our empirical evidence reveals that positive shocks in the oil implied volatility index play a key role in most of Africa's stock markets in market downturns while negative shocks play a moderate role during benign market conditions in some of Africa's stock markets during the pandemic. More importantly, our findings divulge that investors can find an invaluable shelter with a portfolio of the selected African stocks and oil market securities in the time of the pandemic. The policy implications are further discussed.

Indexed as

AfricaCompetitive market hypothesisOil-exportingOil implied volatilityOil-importingQuantile regressionStock returns

Identifiers

PMID34629684
PMCPMC8491971
OpenAlexW3204231213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.