[Teleconsultation in the follow-up of the asthma patient. Lessons after COVID-19].

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Impact of Telemedicine on Asthma Control and Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Review
2. Current expert opinion and attitudes to optimize telemedicine and achieve control in patients with asthma in post-pandemic era: The COMETA consensus.Atencion primaria · 2022
   Article
3. Teleconsultation in respiratory medicine - A position paper of the Portuguese Pulmonology Society.Pulmonology
   Review
4. [Telemedicine Guide FOR Patients on Home Respiratory Therapies (Tele-HRT)].Open respiratory archives
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.