Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34629050›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2021

What do stroke survivors' value about participating in research and what are the most important research problems related to stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA)? A survey.

Ishanka Weerasekara, Jasmine Baye, Meredith Burke, Gary Crowfoot, Gillian Mason, Rachael Peak, Dawn Simpson, Frederick Rohan Walker, Michael Nilsson, Michael Pollack and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How should we measure physical activity after stroke? An international consensus.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ishanka WeerasekaraSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing & Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia. Ishanka.weerasekara@uon.edu.au.
Jasmine BayeSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing & Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Meredith Burke, Newcastle, Australia.
Gary CrowfootSchool of Nursing and Midwifery and Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Gillian MasonSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing & Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Rachael PeakSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing & Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Dawn SimpsonSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing & Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Frederick Rohan WalkerSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing & Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Michael NilssonHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Michael PollackRehabilitation Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Coralie EnglishSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing & Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecruitment to stroke clinical trials is challenging, but consumer registers can facilitate participation. Researchers need to understand the key factors that facilitate trial involvement and improve consumer partnerships to identify what research topics important to stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) survivors and their carers. We aimed to examine i) the experience of being involved in a stroke research register, and ii) the priorities for stroke research from the perspective of stroke survivors.

methodsOnline and paper-based surveys were sent directly to members of a stroke register and disseminated online. Multiple choice questions were reported as counts and percentages and open-ended questions were thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke's 6-stage process.

resultsOf 445 survey respondents, 154 (38%) were a member of the Stroke Research Register. The most frequently reported reason for research participation was to help others in the future. Respondents reported they were less likely to take part in research if the research question was not relevant to them, if transport was an issue, or because they lacked time. The most important research problems reported were targeting specific impairments including recovery of movement, fatigue, and aphasia, improvement of mental health services, and increased support for carers.

conclusionsRecruitment to trials may be improved by research registers if an inclusive research culture is fostered, in which consumers feel valued as members of a community, have direct and timely access to research findings and the opportunity to be meaningfully involved in research around the problems that consumers find most important.

Indexed as

Ischemic Attack, TransientStrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID34629050
PMCPMC8502417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.