Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34628965›Full record

ArticleJDR clinical and translational research2022

Physical Constraint in Pediatric Dentistry: The Lived Experience of Parents.

P Malik, B Ferraz Dos Santos, F Girard, R Hovey, C Bedos

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDR clinical and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Provider perspectives on pain management practices and needs in pediatric dentistry.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P MalikFaculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
B Ferraz Dos SantosFaculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
F GirardDepartment of Oral Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
R HoveyFaculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
C BedosFaculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
McGill University · CAMontreal Children's Hospital · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of physical constraint in pediatric dentistry is highly controversial. Papoose boards in particular, which envelop and immobilize children during treatment procedures, have been described as barbaric devices even though their goal is to protect the patient. In this debate, the voice of parents is important but still missing in the scientific literature.

aimTo understand how parents or caregivers experienced physical constraint and the use of the papoose board on their children during regular dental treatment.

designWe conducted qualitative research rooted in interpretive phenomenology. Accordingly, we performed in-depth individual interviews with a purposive sample of 7 parents or caregivers. The interviews took place in Montréal, Canada, after the children had been treated with a papoose board for nonemergency dental treatments. The discussions were audio recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.

resultsTwo perspectives emerged among participants. Some explained that the papoose board calmed their children, helped the dentist to complete the procedures, and made their experience less stressful. For others, the papoose board was a horrible and traumatizing experience, leading to feelings of guilt toward their children. They expressed anger toward the dentists for not allowing them enough time to decide and for imposing use of the device.

conclusionOur study raises serious ethical concerns about this practice. We believe that using a papoose board should remain an extraordinary measure and, more generally, that dental professionals should reflect on the place of children and their families in clinical encounters. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: The findings of this study should encourage policy makers, dental professionals and ethicists to consider the following points: 1) the traumatizing experiences described by parents raise serious ethical concerns about the use of papoose boards; 2) the dental profession should reflect on the place of children and their families in the clinical encounter and grapple with the importance of consent and how to ensure consent in encounters involving children and their parents.

Indexed as

ParentsPediatric DentistryCanadaCaregiversChildHumansQualitative Researchdental care for childrenpatient-centered carephenomenological studyphysical restraintqualitative researchshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID34628965
PMCPMC9490434
OpenAlexW3205924353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.