Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34628592›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience bulletin2022

Neuro-Behavioral Dynamic Prediction of Interpersonal Cooperation and Aggression.

Wei Wang, Chao Fu, Xiangzeng Kong, Roman Osinsky, Johannes Hewig, Yiwen Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei WangSchool of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
Chao FuSchool of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
Xiangzeng KongSchool of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
Roman OsinskyDepartment of Differential Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Osnabruck University, 49074, Osnabrück, Germany.
Johannes HewigDepartment of Psychology, University of Würzburg, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Yiwen WangSchool of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China. wangeven@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6879-8974

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How to quickly predict an individual's behavioral choices is an important issue in the field of human behavior research. Using noninvasive electroencephalography, we aimed to identify neural markers in the prior outcome-evaluation stage and the current option-assessment stage of the chicken game that predict an individual's behavioral choices in the subsequent decision-output stage. Hierarchical linear modeling-based brain-behavior association analyses revealed that midfrontal theta oscillation in the prior outcome-evaluation stage positively predicted subsequent aggressive choices; also, beta oscillation in the current option-assessment stage positively predicted subsequent cooperative choices. These findings provide electrophysiological evidence for the three-stage theory of decision-making and strengthen the feasibility of predicting an individual's behavioral choices using neural oscillations.

Indexed as

AggressionInterpersonal RelationsBrainElectroencephalographyAggressionBrain-behavior associationsChicken gameCooperationDecision-makingNeural oscillations

Identifiers

PMID34628592
PMCPMC8975956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.