ArticleCell and tissue banking2022
Lyophilized amniotic membrane graft for primary pterygium surgery: preliminary results.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precut disc of lyophilized amniotic membrane for recurrent full thickness macular hole management.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- Perspectives on the use of decellularized/devitalized and lyophilized human perinatal tissues for bone repair: Advantages and remaining challenges.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Surfactant replacement therapy as promising treatment for COVID-19: an updated narrative review.Bioscience reports · 2023Review
- Conjunctival and Limbal Conjunctival Autograft vs. Amniotic Membrane Graft in Primary Pterygium Surgery: A 30-Year Comprehensive Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Review
- Solving STODS-Surgical Temporary Ocular Discomfort Syndrome.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the tolerability, safety and efficacy of new lyophilized amniotic membrane (LAM) presentation for ocular use. A prospective case-series cohort of four patients with primary nasal pterygium which undergone excision and LAM implantation was evaluated for complications and clinical outcomes. Surgical manipulation of LAM was also assessed. LAM was stiff and easy to manipulate as well as no tearing occurred during surgery or suturing. Ocular comfort was checked and similar among those patients with LAM glued or sutured. After 12 months, there were no issues about tolerability or adverse events. Lower cosmetic outcomes (recurrence) were stated in 3 patients. Our study showed that LAM could be an effective alternative to cryopreserved amniotic membrane for graft after pterygium excision surgery. Its main advantage, storage at room temperature, can make it of immediate availability. Further studies comparing clinical outcomes of pterygium surgery with cryopreserved amniotic membrane versus LAM would confirm the benefits of the last.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.