Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34628525›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2021

The prognostic significance of [

Christos Sachpekidis, Maximilian Merz, Marc-Steffen Raab, Uta Bertsch, Vivienn Weru, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Anna Jauch, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Triple-tracer PET (Scientific reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Artificial intelligence-based, volumetric assessment of the bone marrow metabolic activity in [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A look into the future: the role of PSMA beyond prostate cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  15. Multitracer PET/CT with [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. First-in-Humans Evaluation of Safety and Dosimetry ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Progress of modern imaging modalities in multiple myeloma.International journal of hematology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christos SachpekidisClinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany. c.sachpekidis@dkfz-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8739-8741
Maximilian MerzDepartment of Hematology and Cell Therapy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Marc-Steffen RaabDepartment of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Uta BertschDepartment of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Vivienn WeruDivision of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Annette Kopp-SchneiderDivision of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Anna JauchInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hartmut GoldschmidtDepartment of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-StraussClinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose[

methodsForty-seven patients with newly diagnosed MM underwent [

resultsMedian follow-up from baseline and follow-up PET/CT were 85.1 months and 76.7 months, respectively. The number of focal, [

conclusionSeveral parameters utilized in IMPeTUs predict PFS in MM patients, suggesting the potentially significant role of the new criteria in patient stratification and response assessment. Additional studies are warranted for the further evaluation of IMPeTUs in the direction of establishment of robust cut-off values with a prognostic significance in the disease.

Indexed as

[18F]FDG PET/CTInterpretation criteriaItalian Myeloma criteria for PET Use (IMPeTUs)Multiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID34628525
PMCPMC8502185
OpenAlexW3206357607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.