Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34628506›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2022

Designing More Effective Cigar Warnings: An Experiment Among Adult Cigar Smokers.

Sarah D Kowitt, Kristen L Jarman, Jennifer Cornacchione Ross, Leah M Ranney, Caleb A Smith, Christine E Kistler, Allison J Lazard, Paschal Sheeran, James F Thrasher, Adam O Goldstein

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Perceived Effectiveness of Cigar Warnings in Discouraging Blunt Use.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Trial
  6. Improving Point-of-Sale Warnings for Single Cigars: Implications for Premium Cigars.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Trial
  7. The Impact of Cigarillo Text Warning Presence and Size on Young Adults' Cigarillo Risk Beliefs, Knowledge, Appeal, and Use Intentions.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of Harm Visibility for Pictorial Health Warning Labels on Cigars.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  10. Messages About Tobacco and Alcohol Co-Users.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah D KowittDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5216-3897
Kristen L JarmanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6707-3058
Jennifer Cornacchione RossDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Leah M RanneyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9766-4767
Caleb A SmithSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Christine E KistlerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Allison J LazardLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2502-2850
Paschal SheeranLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
James F ThrasherDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Adam O GoldsteinDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of South Carolina · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Little Cigar and Cigarillo Warnings to Reduce Tobacco-Related Cancers and DiseaseR01CA240732 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GOLDSTEIN, ADAM O · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLittle systematic evidence exists about the effectiveness of cigar warnings. This study examined the perceived message effectiveness (PME) of warning statements about different health consequences caused by cigars. PME is a validated self-report scale of how effectively a health message discourages smoking. AIMS AND

methodsWe conducted an online study from April to May 2020 with adults in the United States who used cigars in the past 30 days (n = 777). Participants were randomly assigned to view and rate PME (three items, range 1-5) for seven out of 37 text warning statements about different health consequences from cigar use. Linear mixed effects models evaluated the most effective warning characteristics (eg, type of health consequence), controlling for repeated measures and participant demographics.

resultsAnalyses showed that health consequences about the cardiovascular system (B = 0.38), mouth (B = 0.40), other digestive (B = 0.45), respiratory system (B = 0.36), and early death (B = 0.36) were associated with higher PME scores than reproductive health consequences (all p values <.001). Similar results were found for these health consequences compared with addiction (all p values p < .001). We also observed that awareness of the health consequence was associated with higher PME scores (B = 0.19, p < .001) and length of the warning message (number of characters) was associated with lower PME scores (B = -0.007, p = .03). No differences were observed between cancer and noncancer health consequences (p = .27) or health consequences that used plain language versus medical jargon (p = .94).

conclusionsOur study provides new evidence about the perceived effectiveness of different cigar health warning statements and identifies features that may strengthen statements. IMPLICATIONS: Our study with cigar smokers from across the United States provides much-needed evidence concerning the perceived effectiveness of different cigar health warning statements and features that may strengthen such statements. Mandated cigar warnings in the United States could be strengthened by including health consequences that were perceived as more effective in our study (eg, early death), using health consequences that participants were aware of, and using short warning statements.

Indexed as

Cigar SmokingTobacco ProductsAdultHumansProduct LabelingSmokersSmokingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34628506
PMCPMC8887578
OpenAlexW3206180582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.