Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34628285›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2021

Optimal timing of combining sorafenib with trans-arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Yanmei Dai, Huijie Jiang, Hao Jiang, Sheng Zhao, Xu Zeng, Ran Sun, Ruoshui Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Spectrum of therapeutic options in hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of exercise rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanmei DaiDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150086, China.
Huijie JiangDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150086, China. Electronic address: jianghuijie@hrbmu.edu.cn.
Hao JiangDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150086, China.
Sheng ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150086, China.
Xu ZengDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150086, China.
Ran SunDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150086, China.
Ruoshui ZhengDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150086, China.
Harbin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe combination therapy of trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib were proved to be one of the effective methods for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although it has been confirmed that the combination therapy can prolong survival for advanced HCC effectively, the therapeutic efficacy and safety are still controversial and the clinical value has not been determined. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy and discuss the optimal timing of combination for better clinical benefits. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were systematically reviewed to search for relevant studies published before May 15, 2021. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of TACE + sorafenib with TACE + placebo / alone were adopted. Two reviewers independently extracted study outcomes. The data were analyzed through fixed/random-effect meta-analysis models with Review Manager (Version 5. 3) software.

results7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included with 1464 patients with unresectable HCC (734 in TACE + sorafenib group and 730 in TACE + placebo or alone group). Meta-analysis showed that objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were slightly improved in TACE + sorafenib group (ORR: risk ratio = 1.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.42; P = 0.002; DCR: risk ratio = 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.18; P = 0.02). The combination therapy obviously improved time to progression (TTP) (hazard ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.96; P = 0.03) and progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.73, P < 0.00001) but not overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio: 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.59-1.46; P = 0.75) or time to untreatable progression (TTUP) (hazard ratio: 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.31-1.89; P = 0.56). In addition, the incidence of adverse reactions (AEs) in combination group were higher than TACE + placebo / alone group. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed that the heterogeneity of TTP was notably decreased (pre-TACE: P = 0.12, I

conclusionThe combination of TACE and sorafenib significantly can improve TTP and PFS, and reduce the level of risk of adverse reactions of unresectable HCC, especially in the combination before TACE.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinomaMeta-analysisSafetySorafenibSurvivalTrans-arterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID34628285
PMCPMC8515486
OpenAlexW3206074268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.