ArticlePediatric neurology2021
Gene-Targeted Therapies in Pediatric Neurology: Challenges and Opportunities in Diagnosis and Delivery.
Article in Pediatric neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Editing the rulebook: building the policy environment for children to access gene therapy.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Genetic Etiologies of Dystonia with Anarthria/Aphonia.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2026Article
- Bridging development and disease: the potential of LncRNAs as biomarkers and therapeutics in pediatric neurological disorders.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Characteristics of long-term follow-up studies for gene therapies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.Gene therapy · 2026Article
- Strategic consensus on the clinical translation of advanced therapies in paediatric rare neurological disorders.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Article
- Review
- Precision diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Clinical characteristics of pediatric epilepsy in Palestine: a cross-sectional study.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Assessment of Barriers to Referral and Appointment Wait Times for the Evaluation of Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA): Findings from a Web-Based Physician Survey.Neurology and therapy · 2024Article
- Individualized interventions for rare genetic conditions and the research-treatment spectrum: Stakeholder perspectives.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023Article
- Precision medicine for genetic epilepsy on the horizon: Recent advances, present challenges, and suggestions for continued progress.Epilepsia · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGene-targeted therapies are becoming a reality for infants and children with diseases of the nervous system. Rapid scientific advances have led to disease-modifying or even curative treatments. However, delays and gaps in diagnosis, inequitable delivery, and the need for long-term surveillance pose unresolved challenges. OBJECTIVE AND
methodsThe goal of the Child Neurology Society Research Committee was to evaluate and provide guidance on the obstacles, opportunities, and uncertainties in gene-targeted therapies for pediatric neurological disease. The Child Neurology Society Research Committee engaged in collaborative, iterative literature review and committee deliberations to prepare this consensus statement.
resultsWe identified important challenges for gene-targeted therapies that require resource investments, infrastructure development, and strategic planning. Barriers include inequities in diagnosis and delivery of therapies, high costs, and a need for long-term surveillance of efficacy and safety, including systematic tracking of unanticipated effects. Key uncertainties regarding technical aspects and usage of gene-targeted therapies should be addressed, and characterization of new natural histories of diseases will be needed. Counterbalanced with these obstacles and uncertainties is the tremendous potential being demonstrated in treatments and clinical trials of gene-targeted therapies.
conclusionsGiven that gene-targeted therapies for neurological diseases are in their earliest phase, the pediatric neurology community can play a vital role in their guidance and implementation. This role includes facilitating development of infrastructure and guidelines; ensuring efficient, equitable, and ethical implementation of treatments; and advocating for affordable and broad access for all children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.