ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2022
rPAC: Route based pathway analysis for cohorts of gene expression data sets.
Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A comprehensive survey of the approaches for pathway analysis using multi-omics data integration.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pathway analysis is a popular method aiming to derive biological interpretation from high-throughput gene expression studies. However, existing methods focus mostly on identifying which pathway or pathways could have been perturbed, given differential gene expression patterns. In this paper, we present a novel pathway analysis framework, namely rPAC, which decomposes each signaling pathway route into two parts, the upstream portion of a transcription factor (TF) block and the downstream portion from the TF block and generates a pathway route perturbation analysis scheme examining disturbance scores assigned to both parts together. This rPAC scoring is further applied to a cohort of gene expression data sets which produces two summary metrics, "Proportion of Significance" (PS) and "Average Route Score" (ARS), as quantitative measures discerning perturbed pathway routes within and/or between cohorts. To demonstrate rPAC's scoring competency, we first used a large amount of simulated data and compared the method's performance against those by conventional methods in terms of power curve. Next, we performed a case study involving three epithelial cancer data sets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The rPAC method revealed specific pathway routes as potential cancer type signatures. A deeper pathway analysis of sub-groups (i.e., age groups in COAD or cancer sub-types in BRCA) resulted in pathway routes that are known to be associated with the sub-groups. In addition, multiple previously uncharacterized pathways routes were identified, potentially suggesting that rPAC is better in deciphering etiology of a disease than conventional methods particularly in isolating routes and sections of perturbed pathways in a finer granularity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.