Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34627829›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)

The effect of two different doses of dexmedetomidine to prevent emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Wenjing Yi, Jie Li, Yan Zhuang, Lichun Wan, Wenxian Li, Jie Jia

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03760809 (The Effect of Different Dose of Dexmedetomidine Combined With Hydromorphone in Children With Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03760809 phase4completednot on this map

The Effect of Different Dose of Dexmedetomidine Combined With Hydromorphone in Children With Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorEye & ENT Hospital of Fudan UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled130ConditionsAgitated, State, Acute Reaction to StressArmsDexmedetomidine 0.5μg/kg, Dexmedetomidine 1μg/kg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wenjing YiFudan University, Eye, Ear, Nose & Throat Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai, China.
Jie LiFudan University, Eye, Ear, Nose & Throat Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai, China.
Yan ZhuangFudan University, Eye, Ear, Nose & Throat Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai, China.
Lichun WanFudan University, Eye, Ear, Nose & Throat Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai, China.
Wenxian LiFudan University, Eye, Ear, Nose & Throat Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai, China.
Jie JiaFudan University, Eye, Ear, Nose & Throat Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: jiajie@eentanesthesia.com.
Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate different doses of dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy.

methodOne hundred and thirty children aged 3-10 years scheduled for adenotonsillectomy were randomly assigned to two groups. Anesthesia was induced with 0.5 μg.kg

resultsOne hundred twenty four children were randomized into two groups. Five children were excluded because of adverse events and dropout (DEX 0.5 group, n = 58; DEX 1 group, n = 62). No significant differences were noted in the percentage of emergence agitation between the two groups. The times to extubation (p = 0.003), awake, and postanesthesia care unit stay in DEX 0.5 group were shorter than those in DEX 1 group (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the time to spontaneous breath. Approximately 8% of patients in DEX 0.5 group and 18% patients in DEX 1 group presented low SpO

conclusionsA dose of 0.5 μg.kg

trial registrationThe trial is currently completed recruitment, registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (ID:NCT03760809). Inclusion began on 4 January, 2019.

Indexed as

DexmedetomidineEmergence DeliriumTonsillectomyChildDouble-Blind MethodHumansHypnotics and SedativesPsychomotor AgitationDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesDexmedetomidineEmergence agitation

Identifiers

PMID34627829
PMCPMC9373663
OpenAlexW3206648075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.