Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34627765›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2021

Stochastic nucleoid segregation dynamics as a source of the phenotypic variability in E. coli.

Itay Gelber, Alexander Aranovich, Mario Feingold, Itzhak Fishov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emergent Homeostasis and Degeneracy From Multi-Dimensional Attractors.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. The role of active mRNA-ribosome dynamics and closing constriction in daughter chromosome separation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Relative Distribution of DnaA and DNA inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Using conditional independence tests to elucidate causal links in cell cycle regulation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Itay GelberDepartment of Physics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; The Ilse Katz Center for Nanotechnology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Alexander AranovichDepartment of Physics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Mario FeingoldDepartment of Physics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; The Ilse Katz Center for Nanotechnology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Itzhak FishovDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel. Electronic address: fishov@bgu.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segregation of the replicating chromosome from a single to two nucleoid bodies is one of the major processes in growing bacterial cells. The segregation dynamics is tuned by intricate interactions with other cellular processes such as growth and division, ensuring flexibility in a changing environment. We hypothesize that the internal stochasticity of the segregation process may be the source of cell-to-cell phenotypic variability, in addition to the well-established gene expression noise and uneven partitioning of low copy number components. We compare dividing cell lineages with filamentous cells, where the lack of the diffusion barriers is expected to reduce the impact of other factors on the variability of nucleoid segregation dynamics. The nucleoid segregation was monitored using time-lapse microscopy in live E. coli cells grown in linear grooves. The main characteristics of the segregation process, namely, the synchrony of partitioning, rates of separation, and final positions, as well as the variability of these characteristics, were determined for dividing and filamentous lineages growing under the same conditions. Indeed, the gene expression noise was considerably homogenized along filaments as determined from the distribution of CFP and YFP stochastically expressed from the chromosome. We find that 1) the synchrony of nucleoid partitioning is progressively decreasing during consecutive cell cycles, but to a significantly lesser degree in filamentous than in dividing cells; 2) the mean partitioning rate of nucleoids is essentially the same in dividing and filamentous cells, displaying a substantial variability in both; and 3) nucleoids segregate to the same distances in dividing and filamentous cells. Variability in distances is increasing during successive cell cycles, but to a much lesser extent in filamentous cells. Our findings indicate that the variability of the chromosome segregation dynamics is reduced upon removal of boundaries between nucleoids, whereas the remaining variability is essentially inherent to the nucleoid itself.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsBacterial ProteinsBiological Variation, PopulationChromosomes, BacterialChromosome SegregationBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34627765
PMCPMC8633714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.