Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34627715›Full record

ArticleJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety2021

Disparities After Discharge: The Association of Limited English Proficiency and Postdischarge Patient-Reported Issues.

Lev Malevanchik, Margaret Wheeler, Kristin Gagliardi, Leah Karliner, Sachin J Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Effects of Limited English Proficiency on Outcomes Following Burn Injury.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Characterizing Spanish-speaking patients' patient-centered care experiences in the emergency department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lev Malevanchik
Margaret Wheeler
Kristin Gagliardi
Leah Karliner
Sachin J Shah

Funding

Institutional Career Development Core SupplementKL2TR001870 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KANAYA, ALKA M., SARKAR, URMIMALA · 2016 to 2025
$19.7M
Mentoring Researchers on Clinical Communication With Diverse Aging PopulationsK24AG067003 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KARLINER, LEAH S · 2021 to 2025
$943k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001870NIA NIH HHS K24 AG067003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transition from hospital to home is a vulnerable period for all patients, particularly for those who have limited English proficiency (LEP).

methodsThe research team retrospectively studied adults discharged home from a hospital in 2018-2019 to determine the association of LEP with (1) reach of a care transitions outreach program phone call (automated call within three days after discharge or a subsequent manual phone call) and (2) postdischarge issues reported on the phone calls. All results were adjusted for measured confounders; associations using predicted probabilities and average marginal effects were described.

resultsA total of 13,860 patients were included, and 11.3% had LEP. After adjustment, the program reached most patients regardless of LEP status; automated calls were more likely to reach English proficient patients (81.1% vs. 75.6%, p < 0.01), and when the automated call was unsuccessful, manual calls were more likely to reach LEP patients (47.8% vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001). After adjustment, patients with LEP reported more difficulty with all measured issues: understanding discharge instructions (11.3% vs. 6.5%), obtaining prescriptions (8.3% vs. 5.5%), medication concerns (12.9% vs. 10.6%), follow-up questions (16.1% vs. 13.3%), new or worsening symptoms (15.1% vs. 11.9%), and any other clinical issues (16.6% vs. 13.0%); p < 0.05 for all comparisons.

conclusionAlthough reach was high for the care transitions program, among patients with LEP, important disparities exist in patient-reported postdischarge issues. These results indicate the need for better discharge processes that focus on communication quality and health equity.

Indexed as

Limited English ProficiencyPatient DischargeAdultAftercareCommunication BarriersHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34627715
PMCPMC9246478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.