Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34627624›Full record

ReviewVaccine2021

Strategies for vaccine-product innovation: Creating an enabling environment for product development to uptake in low- and middle-income countries.

Birgitte Giersing, Natasha Shah, Debra Kristensen, Jean-Pierre Amorij, Anna-Lea Kahn, Kristoffer Gandrup-Marino, Courtney Jarrahian, Darin Zehrung, Marion Menozzi-Arnaud

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Vaccine Innovation Meta-Model for Pandemic Contexts.Journal of pharmaceutical innovation · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Birgitte GiersingWorld Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. Electronic address: giersingb@who.int.
Natasha ShahWorld Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Debra KristensenPATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA.
Jean-Pierre AmorijUNICEF, Oceanvej 10-12, 2150, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anna-Lea KahnWorld Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Kristoffer Gandrup-MarinoUNICEF, Oceanvej 10-12, 2150, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Courtney JarrahianPATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA.
Darin ZehrungPATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA.
Marion Menozzi-ArnaudGavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Global Health Campus, Chemin du Pommier 40, 1218, Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, Switzerland.
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health · USWorld Health Organization · CHGavi · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine-product innovations that address barriers to immunization are urgently needed to achieve equitable vaccine coverage, as articulated in the new Immunization Agenda 2030 and the Gavi 5.0 strategy. In 2020, the Vaccine Innovation Prioritisation Strategy (VIPS) prioritized three innovations, namely microarray patches (MAPs), heat-stable and controlled-temperature chain (CTC) enabled liquid vaccine formulations and barcodes on primary packaging. These innovations were prioritized based on the priority immunization barriers that they may help overcome in resource constrained contexts, as well as by considering their potential impact on health, coverage and equity, safety, economic costs and their technical readiness and commercial feasibility. VIPS is now working to accelerate the development and lay the foundation for future uptake of the three priority vaccine-product innovations, with the long term-goal to ensure equitable vaccine coverage and increased impact of vaccines in low- and middle- income countries. To inform our strategic planning, we analyzed four commercially available vaccine product-innovations and conducted interviews with individuals from 17 immunization organizations, and/or independent immunization experts. The findings are synthesized into an 'innovation conundrum' that describes the challenges encountered in developing vaccine-product innovations and a vaccine-product innovation 'theory of change', which highlights actions that should be undertaken in parallel to product development to incentivize sustainable investment and prepare the pathway for uptake and impact.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsVaccinesDeveloping CountriesHumansImmunizationVaccinationVaccinesGavi 5.0Immunization agenda 2030Vaccine Innovation Prioritisation Strategy (VIPS)Vaccine product innovationsZero-dose children

Identifiers

PMID34627624
PMCPMC8657812
OpenAlexW3204498325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.