Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34627564›Full record

ArticleIndian heart journal

Guide catheter extension systems: Hype or a need?

Sharad Chandra, Ashish Tiwari, Gaurav Chaudhary, Rakesh Yadav

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sharad ChandraDepartment of Cardiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226003, India. Electronic address: sharadaiims@gmail.com.
Ashish TiwariDepartment of Cardiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226003, India. Electronic address: sharadaiims@gmail.com.
Gaurav ChaudharyDepartment of Cardiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226003, India. Electronic address: gauravchaudharydr@gmail.com.
Rakesh YadavDepartment of Cardiology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: rakeshyadav123@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guide catheter extension system (GCES) is a valuable tool for interventional cardiologists, especially in complex cases. GCES increases guide back-up support and is crucial in complex PCI procedures, particularly in cases of severe calcification and tortuosity. Apart from their primary use to increase back-up support of guide by providing coaxial alignment, deep intubation and facilitation of stent delivery, GCES are now being increasingly used in different clinical indications including complex and high-risk coronary intervention interventions.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionCardiac CathetersCathetersCoronary AngiographyHumansStentsTreatment OutcomeComplex PCICoronary artery diseaseGuide catheter extension system

Identifiers

PMID34627564
PMCPMC8514394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.