ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2021
The impact of a digital wheeze detector on parental disease management of pre-school children suffering from wheezing-a pilot study.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Objective detection of wheeze at home by parents through a digital device: usage patterns and relationship with SABA administration.Pediatric pulmonology · 2025Trial
- A smartphone app for preschool wheezing and reliability of medical history collection.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024Trial
- Improving asthma control assessment and outcomes in children with asthma using an artificial intelligence digital tool: a prospective multicentre cohort study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Improving the management and outcomes of preschool wheeze: protocol of a prospective multicentre cohort study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Article
- The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Asthma Management: Opportunities and Challenges for Modern Healthcare.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Digitally mapping the asthma journey-from diagnosis to remission.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Review
- Digital twins for chronic lung diseases.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Review
- Current Challenges in Pediatric Asthma.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence and wheezing in children: where are we now?Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Clinical efficacy and satisfaction of a digital wheeze detector in a multicentre randomised controlled trial: the WheezeScan study.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- Review
- Review
- Wearable Vital Signs Monitoring for Patients With Asthma: A Review.IEEE sensors journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundViral airway infections are a major reason for doctor's visits at pre-school age, especially when associated with wheezing. While proper treatment requires adequate recognition of airway obstruction, caretakers are often struggling with this judgment, consequently leading to insufficient or late treatment and an unnecessary discomfort of the patient. Digital technologies may serve to support parental decision taking. The aim of the present pilot study is to acquire data on the feasibility of recruitment and observation procedures for a randomized controlled trial on the impact of a digital wheeze detector in a home management setting of pre-school wheezing.
methodsThis single-armed pilot study enrolled patients with a doctor's diagnosis of wheezing aged 9 to 72 months. Participants were asked to use a digital wheeze detector (WheezeScan, Omron Healthcare, Japan) 2×/day for 30 days and record the child's respiratory symptoms, detection of wheezing, and medication intake via an electronic diary (eDiary) app. Demographic and clinical data were collected at the recruitment visit. The asthma control test and the Parent Asthma Management Self-Efficacy Scale (PAMSES) were assessed both, at recruitment and follow-up.
resultsTwenty families were recruited and completed the monitoring. All but one completed the follow-up after 30 days. The recruitment procedures were feasible, and adherence to daily monitoring reached an average of 81%. The use of the wheeze detector was rated as uncomplicated. Parents detected wheezing without digital support in only 22/708 (3.1%) of the recorded events. By contrast, the wheeze detector indicated an airway obstruction in 140/708 (19.8%) of the recordings.
conclusionIn parallel to feasible recruitment procedures, we observed good usability of the wheeze detection device and high adherence to eDiary recording. The positive outcomes show that the WheezeScan may empower parents by increasing their capacity for wheeze detection. This deserves to be investigated in a larger randomized controlled trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.