Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34627350›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2021

Evolving outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for severe COVID-19 ARDS in Sorbonne hospitals, Paris.

Matthieu Schmidt, Elise Langouet, David Hajage, Sarah Aissi James, Juliette Chommeloux, Nicolas Bréchot, Petra Barhoum, Lucie Lefèvre, Antoine Troger, Marc Pineton de Chambrun and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Respiratory Support in COVID-19-Related Respiratory Failure: Lessons Learnt.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthieu Schmidt *Inserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France. matthieu.schmidt@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2931-4412
Elise Langouet *Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, iCAN, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
David HajageINSERM, Institut Pierre-Louis d'Epidémiologie Et de Santé Publique, APHP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Sorbonne Université, CIC-1421, Paris, France.
Sarah Aissi JamesService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, iCAN, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
Juliette ChommelouxInserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Nicolas BréchotInserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Petra BarhoumInserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Lucie LefèvreInserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Antoine TrogerInserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Marc Pineton de ChambrunInserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Guillaume HékimianInserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Charles-Edouard LuytInserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Martin DresGRC 30, RESPIRE, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Jean-Michel ConstantinGRC 29, APHP, DMU DREAM, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Muriel FartoukhGRC 30, RESPIRE, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Pascal LeprinceInserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Guillaume LebretonInserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Alain CombesInserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
GRC RESPIRE Sorbonne Université
Inserm · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was frequently used to treat patients with severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-associated acute respiratory distress (ARDS) during the initial outbreak. Care of COVID-19 patients evolved markedly during the second part of 2020. Our objective was to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who received ECMO for severe COVID-19 ARDS before or after July 1, 2020.

methodsWe included consecutive adults diagnosed with COVID-19 in Paris-Sorbonne University Hospital Network ICUs, who received ECMO for severe ARDS until January 28, 2021. Characteristics and survival probabilities over time were estimated during the first and second waves. Pre-ECMO risk factors predicting 90-day mortality were assessed using multivariate Cox regression.

resultsCharacteristics of the 88 and 71 patients admitted, respectively, before and after July 1, 2020, were comparable except for older age, more frequent use of dexamethasone (18% vs. 82%), high-flow nasal oxygenation (19% vs. 82%) and/or non-invasive ventilation (7% vs. 37%) after July 1. Respective estimated probabilities (95% confidence intervals) of 90-day mortality were 36% (27-47%) and 48% (37-60%) during the first and the second periods. After adjusting for confounders, probability of 90-day mortality was significantly higher for patients treated after July 1 (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.02-5.07). ECMO-related complications did not differ between study periods.

conclusions90-day mortality of ECMO-supported COVID-19-ARDS patients increased significantly after July 1, 2020, and was no longer comparable to that of non-COVID ECMO-treated patients. Failure of prolonged non-invasive oxygenation strategies before intubation and increased lung damage may partly explain this outcome.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultCohort StudiesCOVID-19Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMortalityParisRespiratory Distress SyndromeTreatment OutcomeAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)COVID-19Extracorporeal membrane oxygenationOutcomesSARS-CoV-2Venovenous ECMO

Identifiers

PMID34627350
PMCPMC8502094
OpenAlexW3205798050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.