Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34627313›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2021

Reduction of inter-observer differences in the delineation of the target in spinal metastases SBRT using an automatic contouring dedicated system.

Niccolò Giaj-Levra, Vanessa Figlia, Francesco Cuccia, Rosario Mazzola, Luca Nicosia, Francesco Ricchetti, Michele Rigo, Giorgio Attinà, Claudio Vitale, Gianluisa Sicignano and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Contouring aid tools in radiotherapy. Smoothing: the false friend.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Niccolò Giaj-LevraAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A.Sempreboni 5, 37124, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy. niccolo.giajlevra@sacrocuore.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4328-0319
Vanessa FigliaAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A.Sempreboni 5, 37124, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
Francesco CucciaAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A.Sempreboni 5, 37124, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
Rosario MazzolaAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A.Sempreboni 5, 37124, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
Luca NicosiaAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A.Sempreboni 5, 37124, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
Francesco RicchettiAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A.Sempreboni 5, 37124, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
Michele RigoAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A.Sempreboni 5, 37124, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
Giorgio AttinàAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A.Sempreboni 5, 37124, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
Claudio VitaleAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A.Sempreboni 5, 37124, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
Gianluisa SicignanoAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A.Sempreboni 5, 37124, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
Antonio De SimoneAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A.Sempreboni 5, 37124, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
Stefania NaccaratoAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A.Sempreboni 5, 37124, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
Ruggero RuggieriAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A.Sempreboni 5, 37124, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
Filippo AlongiAdvanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A.Sempreboni 5, 37124, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately one third of cancer patients will develop spinal metastases, that can be associated with back pain, neurological symptoms and deterioration in performance status. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have been offered in clinical practice mainly for the management of oligometastatic and oligoprogressive patients, allowing the prescription of high total dose delivered in one or few sessions to small target volumes, minimizing the dose exposure of normal tissues. Due to the high delivered doses and the proximity of critical organs at risk (OAR) such as the spinal cord, the correct definition of the treatment volume becomes even more important in SBRT treatment, thus making it necessary to standardize the method of target definition and contouring, through the adoption of specific guidelines and specific automatic contouring tools. An automatic target contouring system for spine SBRT is useful to reduce inter-observer differences in target definition. In this study, an automatic contouring tool was evaluated.

methodsSimulation CT scans and MRI data of 20 patients with spinal metastases were evaluated. To evaluate the advantage of the automatic target contouring tool (Elements SmartBrush Spine), which uses the identification of different densities within the target vertebra, we evaluated the agreement of the contours of 20 spinal target (2 cervical, 9 dorsal and 9 lumbar column), outlined by three independent observers using the automatic tool compared to the contours obtained manually, and measured by DICE similarity coefficient.

resultsThe agreement of GTV contours outlined by independent operators was superior with the use of the automatic contour tool compared to manually outlined contours (mean DICE coefficient 0.75 vs 0.57, p = 0.048).

conclusionsThe dedicated contouring tool allows greater precision and reduction of inter-observer differences in the delineation of the target in SBRT spines. Thus, the evaluated system could be useful in the setting of spinal SBRT to reduce uncertainties of contouring increasing the level of precision on target delivered doses.

Indexed as

HumansObserver VariationOrgans at RiskRadiosurgerySpinal NeoplasmsTumor BurdenMetastasesRadiotherapySoftwareSpineStereotactic

Identifiers

PMID34627313
PMCPMC8502264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.