Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34627295›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2021

Preserving for the future the - once widespread but now vanishing - knowledge on traditional pig grazing in forests and marshes (Sava-Bosut floodplain, Serbia).

Zsolt Molnár, Klára Szabados, Alen Kiš, Jelena Marinkov, László Demeter, Marianna Biró, Kinga Öllerer, Krisztián Katona, Marko Đapić, Ranko Perić and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zsolt MolnárCentre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, 2163, Hungary. molnar.zsolt@ecolres.hu.
Klára SzabadosInstitute for Nature Conservation of Vojvodina Province, Novi Sad, 21101, Serbia.
Alen KišInstitute for Nature Conservation of Vojvodina Province, Novi Sad, 21101, Serbia.
Jelena MarinkovMTA-DE 'Lendület' Evolutionary Phylogenomics Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Debrecen, 4032, Hungary.
László DemeterCentre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, 2163, Hungary.
Marianna BiróCentre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, 2163, Hungary.
Kinga ÖllererCentre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, 2163, Hungary.
Krisztián KatonaInstitute for Wildlife Management and Nature Conservation, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
Marko ĐapićInstitute for Nature Conservation of Vojvodina Province, Novi Sad, 21101, Serbia.
Ranko PerićInstitute for Nature Conservation of Vojvodina Province, Novi Sad, 21101, Serbia.
Viktor UlicsniCentre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, 2163, Hungary.
Dániel BabaiResearch Centre for the Humanities, Institute of Ethnology, Budapest, 1097, Hungary.

Funding

Academia Româna RO1567-IBB03/2020Magyar Tudományos Akadémia MTA Lendület_2020-56MTA Premium PostdoctoralFellowship PPD2019-7/2019Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal K 119478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional knowledge is key for sustainability, but it is rapidly disappearing. Pig keeping in forests and marshes is an ancient, once widespread, now vanishing practice, with a major economic and ecological potential. The knowledge of pig keepers and the foraging activity of pigs are hardly documented.

methodsWe studied the knowledge of traditional pig keepers (svinjars) on wild plants and pig foraging on the Sava-Bosut forest-marsh complex in Serbia. We conducted picture-based interviews about 234 locally common and/or salient plant species, and participatory fieldwork (11 days) and visual observation (21 days) on pig foraging.

results181 wild plant species were known by svinjars and 106 taxa were consumed by pigs. Svinjars knew well and could name most regularly foraged species. 98 species were reported by svinjars as foraged and 56 as not eaten. 28 species were observed by the authors as eaten regularly, while 21 were nibbled and 17 avoided. Contradictory information on foraging was rare both among svinjars (8 species) and between svinjars and researchers (7 species); several of these species were rare. Leaves of 92, fruits or seeds of 21 and 'roots' of 20 species were reported or observed as eaten, usually with high seasonality. Svinjars were overall observant, but knew little about some less salient species (e.g. Veronica, Circaea). The most common forages (reported and/or observed) were fruits (Quercus, fleshy fruits), grasses (Agrostis, Glyceria), herbs (Ranunculus ficaria, Circaea), nutritious 'roots' (Carex spp., Iris), young shrub leaves (Crataegus, Carpinus) and 'tame' plants growing in the sun (Persicaria dubia, Erigeron annuus). Traditional, now extinct pig breeds were reported as less selective and more 'knowledgeable' about plants, as they received less additional fodder. Svinjars learnt their knowledge since childhood, from community members, but long-term personal observations and everyday encounters with pigs were also important sources of knowledge.

conclusionsA deeper understanding of pig foraging could contribute to using pigs in nature conservation management, resource management and organic farming, and to a better understanding of wild boar foraging. The knowledge of svinjars is a disappearing intangible cultural heritage of European importance. Knowledge holders deserve recognition, and legal and financial support to continue this tradition.

Indexed as

EthnobotanyForestsWetlandsAnimal FeedAnimalsHerbivoryKnowledgePlant BreedingSerbiaSwineConservation managementCultural heritageForagingKnowledge generationSus scrofa domesticaSustainable use of natural resourcesWild boar

Identifiers

PMID34627295
PMCPMC8501720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.