Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34627240›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2021

Small-scale release of non-gene drive mosquitoes in Burkina Faso: from engagement implementation to assessment, a learning journey.

Lea Pare Toe, Nourou Barry, Anselme D Ky, Souleymane Kekele, Wilfrid Meda, Korotimi Bayala, Mouhamed Drabo, Delphine Thizy, Abdoulaye Diabate

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lea Pare ToeInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, BP 545, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. Lea_toe@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7314-4000
Nourou BarryInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, BP 545, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Anselme D KyInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, BP 545, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Souleymane KekeleInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, BP 545, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Wilfrid MedaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, BP 545, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Korotimi BayalaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, BP 545, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Mouhamed DraboDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Delphine ThizyDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Abdoulaye DiabateInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, BP 545, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFImperial College London · GB

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1141988Open Philanthropy Project Fund 2016-161185Silicon Valley Community Foundation 0-77157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInnovative tools are needed to complement the existing approach for malaria elimination. Gene drive mosquitoes are one potential new technology in the control of malaria vectors. Target Malaria is one of the research projects developing this technology, and in July 2019, the project proceeded to an important step for this evaluation pathway: the small-scale release of non-gene drive sterile male mosquitoes in a village in Burkina Faso. In addition to the entomological and laboratory work to prepare for this important milestone, significant community and stakeholder engagement work was done. The existing guidelines on gene drive mosquito provide an overall framework for such engagement work. However, they do not provide a road map on how to proceed or what benchmarks should be used to assess this work.

methodsThis study provides a review of engagement activities relevant to field trials on non-gene drive genetically-modified mosquitoes as well as an assessment framework-using both qualitative and quantitative studies as well as an audit procedure. The latter was implemented to evaluate whether the release activities could proceed with the appropriate level of agreement from the community.

resultsThis paper shows the importance of this first phase of work to innovate and learn about engagement processes for responsible research in the field of genetic approaches for malaria vector control. The function of these assessments is crucial for the learning agenda. The assessments demonstrated ways to increase understanding and ensure effective progress with field studies and, therefore, the pathway for responsible research.

conclusionGene drive technology is increasingly considered as a promising approach to control vector borne diseases, in particular malaria. Stakeholders' involvement in this research process is one of the recurring requirements in international guidance documents. With this paper Target Malaria offers an opportunity to explore the practical achievements and challenges of stakeholder engagement during early phases of a technology evaluation, and in particular how it implemented an assessment framework to learn from its experience.

Indexed as

Gene Drive TechnologyAnimalsBurkina FasoComprehensionInfertility, MaleKnowledgeMalariaMaleMedical AuditMosquito ControlStakeholder ParticipationAuditEvaluationGene driveGenetically modified mosquitoes releaseMalariaResponsible researchStakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID34627240
PMCPMC8502271
OpenAlexW3207760512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.