Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34627236›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2021

Safety monitoring experience of single-low dose primaquine co-administered with artemether-lumefantrine among providers and patients in routine healthcare practice: a qualitative study in Eastern Tanzania.

Dominic Mosha, Mwaka A Kakolwa, Muhidin K Mahende, Honorati Masanja, Salim Abdulla, Chris Drakeley, Roland Gosling, Joyce Wamoyi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Dominic MoshaIfakara Health Institute, Plot 463, Kiko Ave, Mikocheni, P.O Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. dfmosha@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7258-9289
Mwaka A KakolwaIfakara Health Institute, Plot 463, Kiko Ave, Mikocheni, P.O Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Muhidin K MahendeIfakara Health Institute, Plot 463, Kiko Ave, Mikocheni, P.O Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Honorati MasanjaIfakara Health Institute, Plot 463, Kiko Ave, Mikocheni, P.O Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Salim AbdullaIfakara Health Institute, Plot 463, Kiko Ave, Mikocheni, P.O Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Chris DrakeleyDepartment of Immunology and Infection, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Roland GoslingDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Joyce WamoyiNational Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Ifakara Health Institute · TZLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNational Institute for Medical Research · TZUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership EDCTPEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership TMA2017CDF-1878-PRIMAQUINE Roll out
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimaquine is a gametocytocidal drug recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) in a single-low dose combined with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for the treatment and prevention of Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission. Safety monitoring concerns and the lack of a universal validated and approved primaquine pharmacovigilance tool is a challenge for a national rollout in many countries. This study aimed to explore the acceptance, reliability and perceived effectiveness of the primaquine roll out monitoring pharmacovigilance tool (PROMPT).

methodsThis study was conducted in three dispensaries in the Coastal region of Eastern Tanzania. The study held six in-depth interviews with healthcare providers and six participatory focus group discussions with malaria patients (3) and parents/guardians of sick children (3). Participants were purposively sampled. Thematic analysis was conducted with the aid of NVivo qualitative analysis software.

resultsThe respondents' general acceptance and perceived effectiveness of the single-low dose primaquine and PROMPT was good. Screening procedure for treatment eligibility and explaining to patients about the possible adverse events was considered very useful for safety reasons. Crushing and dissolving of primaquine tablet to get the appropriate dose, particularly in children, was reported by all providers to be challenging. Transport costs and poor access to the health facility were the main reasons for a patient failing to return to the clinic for a scheduled follow-up visit. Treatment was perceived to be safe by both providers and patients and reported no case of a severe adverse event. Some providers were concerned with the haemoglobin drop observed on day 7.

conclusionSingle-low dose primaquine was perceived to be safe and acceptable among providers and patients. PROMPT demonstrated to be a reliable and user-friendly tool among providers. Further validation of the tool by involving the National Malaria Control Programme is pivotal to addressing key challenges and facilitating primaquine adoption in the national policy.

Indexed as

AdultAntimalarialsArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMalaria, FalciparumMaleMiddle AgedParentsPatient Care TeamPrimaquineSafetyAntimalarialsArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationPrimaquineArtemether–lumefantrineMalariaMonitoringPrimaquineSafety

Identifiers

PMID34627236
PMCPMC8501629
OpenAlexW3170542230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.