Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34627219›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2021

Understanding family planning decision-making: perspectives of providers and community stakeholders from Istanbul, Turkey.

Duygu Karadon, Yilmaz Esmer, Bahar Ayca Okcuoglu, Sebahat Kurutas, Simay Sevval Baykal, Sarah Huber-Krum, David Canning, Iqbal Shah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Duygu KaradonBahcesehir Universiy, Istanbul, Turkey. duygu.karadon@eas.bau.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0003-1086-8607
Yilmaz EsmerBahcesehir Universiy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bahar Ayca OkcuogluBahcesehir Universiy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sebahat KurutasBahcesehir Universiy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Simay Sevval BaykalBahcesehir Universiy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sarah Huber-KrumHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
David CanningHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Iqbal ShahHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Bahçeşehir University · TRHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of factors may determine family planning decisions; however, some may be dependent on the social and cultural context. To understand these factors, we conducted a qualitative study with family planning providers and community stakeholders in a diverse, low-income neighborhood of Istanbul, Turkey.

methodsWe used purposeful sampling to recruit 16 respondents (eight family planning service providers and eight community stakeholders) based on their potential role and influence on matters related to sexual and reproductive health issues. Interviews were audio-recorded with participants' permission and subsequently transcribed in Turkish and translated into English for analysis. We applied a multi-stage analytical strategy, following the principles of the constant comparative method to develop a codebook and identify key themes.

resultsResults indicate that family planning decision-making-that is, decision on whether or not to avoid a pregnancy-is largely considered a women's issue although men do not actively object to family planning or play a passive role in actual use of methods. Many respondents indicated that women generally prefer to use family planning methods that do not have side-effects and are convenient to use. Although women trust healthcare providers and the information that they receive from them, they prefer to obtain contraceptive advice from friends and family members. Additionally, attitude of men toward childbearing, fertility desires, characteristics of providers, and religious beliefs of the couple exert considerable influence on family planning decisions.

conclusionsNumerous factors influence family planning decision-making in Turkey. Women have a strong preference for traditional methods compared to modern contraceptives. Additionally, religious factors play a leading role in the choice of the particular method, such as withdrawal. Besides, there is a lack of men's involvement in family planning decision-making. Public health interventions should focus on incorporating men into their efforts and understanding how providers can better provide information to women about contraception.

Indexed as

Family Planning ServicesMenContraceptionContraception BehaviorFemaleHumansMalePregnancyTurkeyDecision-makingFamily planningHealth decisionsQualitative dataTurkey

Identifiers

PMID34627219
PMCPMC8502330
OpenAlexW3206678962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.