Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34627158›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2021

Stool preparation under anaerobic conditions contributes to retention of obligate anaerobes: potential improvement for fecal microbiota transplantation.

Hirotaka Shimizu, Katsuhiro Arai, Takashi Asahara, Takuya Takahashi, Hirokazu Tsuji, Satoshi Matsumoto, Ichiro Takeuchi, Reiko Kyodo, Yuichiro Yamashiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Current perspectives on fecal microbiota transplantation in inflammatory bowel disease.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hirotaka ShimizuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Specialty, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan. shimizu-h@ncchd.go.jp.
Katsuhiro AraiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Specialty, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi AsaharaYakult Central Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Takuya TakahashiYakult Central Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirokazu TsujiYakult Central Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi MatsumotoYakult Central Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Ichiro TakeuchiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Specialty, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Reiko KyodoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Specialty, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichiro YamashiroProbiotics Research Laboratory, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in patients with ulcerative colitis has shown variable efficacy depending on the protocol used. A previous randomized controlled trial reported that anaerobic preparation of donor stool contributes to improved efficacy. Despite the suggestion that viable obligate anaerobes would be decreased through aerobic handling, there have been only a limited number of reports on how these aerobic or anaerobic procedures affect the composition of viable microbiota in the fecal slurries used for FMT.

methodsWe adopted 16S and 23S rRNA-targeted reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction to quantify viable bacteria in fecal slurries. This study utilized specific primers designed to detect obligate anaerobes (including Clostridium coccoides group, C. leptum subgroup, Bacteroides fragilis group, Bifidobacterium, Atopobium cluster, and Prevotella) and facultative anaerobes (including total lactobacilli, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and Staphylococcus). We then calculated the ratio change (RC) between before and after mixing, and compared the resulting values between anaerobic-prep and aerobic-prep in samples fixed immediately after blending (RC

resultsFor most obligate anaerobes, the median RC tended to be less than 1, indicating that the number of obligate anaerobes was decreased by the blending procedure. However, in samples maintained for 1 h after blending, anaerobic-prep counteracted the decrease otherwise seen for the C. coccoides group and B. fragilis groups (P < 0.01 for both). The C. leptum subgroup also tended to show higher RC by anaerobic-prep than by aerobic-prep, although this effect was not statistically significant. Among facultative anaerobes, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, and Staphylococcus showed median RC values of more than 1, indicating that these organisms survived and even grew after mixing. Moreover, oxygen exposure had no significant influence on the survival of the facultative anaerobes.

conclusionsThe conditions under which the blending procedure was performed affected the proportion of live anaerobes in fecal slurries. The obligate anaerobes tended to be decreased by blending processes, but anaerobic-prep significantly mitigated this effect. Anaerobic-prep may improve the efficacy of FMT by permitting the efficient transfer of obligate anaerobes to patients with ulcerative colitis.

Indexed as

AnaerobiosisBacteria, AnaerobicFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 23SSpecimen HandlingRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 23SAnaerobic preparationFecal microbiota transplantationObligate anaerobes

Identifiers

PMID34627158
PMCPMC8501685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.