ArticleBMC microbiology2021
Stool preparation under anaerobic conditions contributes to retention of obligate anaerobes: potential improvement for fecal microbiota transplantation.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methodological insights into fecal microbiota transplantation: Dissecting key approaches for success.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- Ulcerative colitis: signaling pathways, therapeutic targets and interventional strategies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Gut microbial metabolites in inflammatory bowel disease: immunological mechanisms regulating Treg/Th17 balance and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Fecal microbiota transplantation in ulcerative colitis: mucosal immune mechanisms and precision microbiota therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Recent Advancement of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis- A Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Fucoidan Therapy for Extraintestinal Diseases: Targeting the Microbiota-Gut-Organ Axes.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Multi-Omics Analysis of Gut Microbiota and Sperm Quality in Tibetan Breeding Boars.Metabolites · 2025Article
- Laboratory preparation methods for human-derived fecal microbial suspensions for fecal microbiota transplantation: a review and standardization perspectives.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Clinical Guidelines for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Companion Animals.Advances in small animal care · 2024Article
- Evaluating Bacterial Viability in Faecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Comparative Analysis of In Vitro Cultivation and Membrane Integrity Methods.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2024Article
- Multi-Omics Analysis Unravels the Impact of Stool Sample Logistics on Metabolites and Microbial Composition.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Fecal microbiota transplantation: current challenges and future landscapes.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- Current perspectives on fecal microbiota transplantation in inflammatory bowel disease.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Modeling the limits of detection for antimicrobial resistance genes in agri-food samples: a comparative analysis of bioinformatics tools.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- The practice of fecal microbiota transplantation in inflammatory bowel disease.Intestinal research · 2024Review
- Impact of fecal sample preservation and handling techniques on the canine fecal microbiota profile.PloS one · 2024Article
- Development of a Protocol for Anaerobic Preparation and Banking of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Material: Evaluation of Bacterial Richness in the Cultivated Fraction.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Anaerobic Feces Processing for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Improves Viability of Obligate Anaerobes.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Bacterial Composition and Viability of Equine Feces after Processing for Transplantation.Microorganisms · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in patients with ulcerative colitis has shown variable efficacy depending on the protocol used. A previous randomized controlled trial reported that anaerobic preparation of donor stool contributes to improved efficacy. Despite the suggestion that viable obligate anaerobes would be decreased through aerobic handling, there have been only a limited number of reports on how these aerobic or anaerobic procedures affect the composition of viable microbiota in the fecal slurries used for FMT.
methodsWe adopted 16S and 23S rRNA-targeted reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction to quantify viable bacteria in fecal slurries. This study utilized specific primers designed to detect obligate anaerobes (including Clostridium coccoides group, C. leptum subgroup, Bacteroides fragilis group, Bifidobacterium, Atopobium cluster, and Prevotella) and facultative anaerobes (including total lactobacilli, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and Staphylococcus). We then calculated the ratio change (RC) between before and after mixing, and compared the resulting values between anaerobic-prep and aerobic-prep in samples fixed immediately after blending (RC
resultsFor most obligate anaerobes, the median RC tended to be less than 1, indicating that the number of obligate anaerobes was decreased by the blending procedure. However, in samples maintained for 1 h after blending, anaerobic-prep counteracted the decrease otherwise seen for the C. coccoides group and B. fragilis groups (P < 0.01 for both). The C. leptum subgroup also tended to show higher RC by anaerobic-prep than by aerobic-prep, although this effect was not statistically significant. Among facultative anaerobes, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, and Staphylococcus showed median RC values of more than 1, indicating that these organisms survived and even grew after mixing. Moreover, oxygen exposure had no significant influence on the survival of the facultative anaerobes.
conclusionsThe conditions under which the blending procedure was performed affected the proportion of live anaerobes in fecal slurries. The obligate anaerobes tended to be decreased by blending processes, but anaerobic-prep significantly mitigated this effect. Anaerobic-prep may improve the efficacy of FMT by permitting the efficient transfer of obligate anaerobes to patients with ulcerative colitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.