Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34627155›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Combined nanopore adaptive sequencing and enzyme-based host depletion efficiently enriched microbial sequences and identified missing respiratory pathogens.

Mingyu Gan, Bingbing Wu, Gangfeng Yan, Gang Li, Li Sun, Guoping Lu, Wenhao Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Enrichment techniques for clinical metagenomics.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mingyu Gan *Center for Molecular Medicine, Pediatric Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Bingbing Wu *Center for Molecular Medicine, Pediatric Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Gangfeng YanDepartment of Pediatric Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, 399 Wanyuan Road, Shanghai, 201102, China.
Gang LiCenter for Molecular Medicine, Pediatric Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Li SunDepartment of Rheumatology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Guoping LuDepartment of Pediatric Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, 399 Wanyuan Road, Shanghai, 201102, China. 13788904150@163.com.
Wenhao ZhouCenter for Molecular Medicine, Pediatric Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China. zhouwenhao@fudan.edu.cn.
Children's Hospital of Fudan University · CN

Funding

Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 19495810300Shanghai Hospital Development Center SHDC22020217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnzyme-based host depletion significantly improves the sensitivity of clinical metagenomics. Recent studies found that real-time adaptive sequencing of DNA molecules was achieved using a nanopore sequencing machine, which enabled effective enrichment of microbial sequences. However, few studies have compared the enzyme-based host depletion and nanopore adaptive sequencing for microbial enrichment efficiency.

resultsTo compare the host depletion and microbial enrichment efficiency of enzyme-based and adaptive sequencing methods, the present study collected clinical samples from eight children with respiratory tract infections. The same respiratory samples were subjected to standard methods, adaptive sequencing methods, enzyme-based host depletion methods, and the combination of adaptive sequencing and enzyme-based host depletion methods. We compared the host depletion efficiency, microbial enrichment efficiency, and pathogenic microorganisms detected between the four methods. We found that adaptive sequencing, enzyme-based host depletion and the combined methods significantly enriched the microbial sequences and significantly increased the diversity of microorganisms (p value < 0.001 for each method compared to standard). The highest microbial enrichment efficiency was achieved using the combined method. Compared to the standard method, the combined method increased the microbial reads by a median of 113.41-fold (interquartile range 23.32-327.72, maximum 1812), and the number of genera by a median of 70-fold (interquartile range 56.75-86.75, maximum 164). The combined method detected 6 pathogens in 4 samples with a median read of 547, compared to 5 pathogens in 4 samples with a median read of 4 using the standard method.

conclusionThe combined method is an effective, easy-to-run method for enriching microbial sequences in clinical metagenomics from sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples and may improve the sensitivity of clinical metagenomics for other host-derived clinical samples.

Indexed as

NanoporesNanopore SequencingChildDNAHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetagenomicsDNAHost depletionMetagenomicsMicrobe enrichmentNanopore adaptive sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34627155
PMCPMC8501638
OpenAlexW3202331307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.