Children's group identity is related to their assessment of fair and unfair advantages.

Alexander P D'Esterre, Bonnie Woodward, Melanie Killen

Open access · greenAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental child psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

2citing papers in PubMed

0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

Claims of wrongdoing by outgroup members heighten children's ingroup biases.Acta psychologica · 2022
Article
To Punish or Exclude? Children's Responses to Unfair and Fair Advantages Created in Competitive Contexts.Cognitive development
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander P D'EsterreDepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA. Electronic address: desterre@umd.edu.

Bonnie WoodwardDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.

Melanie KillenDepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

University of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · US

Funding

An Intervention to Promote Positive Peer Relationships and Reduce Prejudice and Bias in ChildhoodR01HD093698 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI KILLEN, MELANIE ANN · 2019 to 2022

$1.6M

NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093698

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unfair advantages can be created either intentionally (e.g., cheating) or unintentionally (e.g., unintended benefit). Little is known regarding how children evaluate different types of advantages in situations where group identity and group membership are made salient. To investigate how children's group identity influences their evaluations and attribution of intentions in intergroup contexts, children were presented with three hypothetical advantages (unintentionally unfair, intentionally unfair, and fair) in a competitive context created by either an in-group member or an out-group member. Children (N = 120) were 4-6 years of age (n = 59; M

Indexed as

IntentionSocial PerceptionAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDeceptionFemaleHumansMaleWhite PeopleCompetitionEvaluationFairnessIntentionsIntergroup attitudesMorality

Identifiers

PMID34626925

DOI10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105292

PMCPMC8608754

OpenAlexW3202297655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceTDM

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.