Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34626837›Full record

ArticleNew biotechnology2022

SARS-CoV2 neutralizing activity of ozone on porous and non-porous materials.

Stella Wolfgruber, Martina Loibner, Markus Puff, Alexander Melischnig, Kurt Zatloukal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Article
  3. Advances in Ozone-Based Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2: An Updated Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Antiviral Activity of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles against SARS-CoV-2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Ozone application in different industries: A review of recent developments.Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2023
    Review
  14. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022
    Article
  15. Application of an Ultrasonic Nebulizer Closet in the Disinfection of Textiles and Footwear.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Ozone Eliminates SARS-CoV-2 from Difficult-to-Clean Office Supplies and Clinical Equipment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stella WolfgruberDiagnostic- and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Martina LoibnerDiagnostic- and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Markus PuffTDK Electronics GmbH & Co OG, Deutschlandsberg, Austria.
Alexander MelischnigTDK Electronics GmbH & Co OG, Deutschlandsberg, Austria.
Kurt ZatloukalDiagnostic- and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. Electronic address: kurt.zatloukal@medunigraz.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has generated a major need for non-destructive and environmentally friendly disinfection methods. This work presents the development and testing of a disinfection process based on gaseous ozone for SARS-CoV-2-contaminated porous and non-porous surfaces. A newly developed disinfection chamber was used, equipped with a CeraPlas™ cold plasma generator that produces ozone during plasma ignition. A reduction of more than log 6 of infectious virus could be demonstrated for virus-contaminated cotton and FFP3 face masks as well as glass slides after exposure to 800 ppm ozone for 10-60 min, depending on the material. In contrast to other disinfectants, ozone can be produced quickly and cost-effectively, and its environmentally friendly breakdown product oxygen does not leave harmful residues. Disinfection with ozone could help to overcome delivery difficulties of personal protective equipment by enabling safe reuse with further applications, thereby reducing waste generation, and may allow regular disinfection of personal items with non-porous surfaces.

Indexed as

OzoneDisinfectionEquipment ContaminationMasksPorositySARS-CoV-2Virus InactivationOzoneCold plasmaCotton maskDisinfectionFFP3 maskOzoneSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34626837
PMCPMC8492887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.