Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34626495›Full record

SynthesisThe New phytologist2022

Perennial, but not annual legumes synergistically benefit from infection with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia: a meta-analysis.

Silmar Primieri, Susan M Magnoli, Thomas Koffel, Sidney L Stürmer, James D Bever

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The New phytologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Legume life history interacts with land use degradation of rhizobia: Implications for restoration success.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Silmar PrimieriInstituto Federal de Santa Catarina (IFSC), Câmpus Lages, Lages, SC, 88506-400, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7438-5930
Susan M MagnoliKansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66047, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1022-1945
Thomas KoffelW. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI, 49060, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1793-8620
Sidney L StürmerDepartamento de Ciências Naturais, Universidade Regional de Blumenau, Blumenau, SC, 89030-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3213-1841
James D BeverKansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66047, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4068-3582
University of Kansas · USInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Santa Catarina · BRMichigan State University · USUniversidade Regional de Blumenau · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many plant species simultaneously interact with multiple symbionts, which can, but do not always, generate synergistic benefits for their host. We ask if plant life history (i.e. annual vs perennial) can play an important role in the outcomes of the tripartite symbiosis of legumes, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), and rhizobia. We performed a meta-analysis of 88 studies examining outcomes of legume-AMF-rhizobia interactions on plant and microbial growth. Perennial legumes associating with AMF and rhizobia grew larger than expected based on their response to either symbiont alone (i.e. their response to co-inoculation was synergistic). By contrast, annual legume growth with co-inoculation did not differ from additive expectations. AMF and rhizobia differentially increased phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) tissue concentration. Rhizobium nodulation increased with mycorrhizal fungi inoculation, but mycorrhizal fungi colonization did not increase with rhizobium inoculation. Microbial responses to co-infection were significantly correlated with synergisms in plant growth. Our work supports a balanced plant stoichiometry mechanism for synergistic benefits. We find that synergisms are in part driven by reinvestment in complementary symbionts, and that time-lags in realizing benefits of reinvestment may limit synergisms in annuals. Optimization of microbiome composition to maximize synergisms may be critical to productivity, particularly for perennial legumes.

Indexed as

FabaceaeMycorrhizaeRhizobiumPhosphorusPlant RootsSymbiosisPhosphorusarbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)inoculationmutualismplant life historyrhizobiasymbiosissynergismtripartite

Identifiers

PMID34626495
PMCPMC9298428
OpenAlexW3207188651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.