ArticleBotanical studies2021
More examples of breakdown the 1:1 partner specificity between figs and fig wasps.
Article in Botanical studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic distance and pollinator sharing shape divergence in floral volatiles in closely related dioecious Ficus species.American journal of botany · 2026Article
- Species-Specific Recognition in Fig-Wasp Mutualism: The Role of Volatile Blends and Seasonal Shifts in Olfactory Responses.Journal of chemical ecology · 2026Article
- Asynchronous Synchronization: A Spatially Explicit Agent-Based Model SimulatingEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Hybridization and introgression between two fig trees with contrasting ecological preferences.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Ionotropic Receptor Genes in Fig Wasps: Evolutionary Insights from Comparative Studies.Insects · 2025Article
- A chromosome-level genome assembly of Ficus benjamina, a fig tree with great ecological and ornamental value.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Extreme specificity in obligate mutualism-A role for competition?Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Pollinator sharing and hybridization in a pair of dioecious figs sheds light on the pathways to speciation.Evolution letters · 2023Article
- Asymmetric sharing of pollinator fig wasps between two sympatric dioecious fig trees: a reflection of supply and demand or differences in the size of their figs?Botanical studies · 2022Article
- Comparison of chloroplast genomes and phylogenomics in the Ficus sarmentosa complex (Moraceae).PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe obligate mutualism between fig trees (Ficus, Moraceae) and pollinating fig wasps (Agaonidae) is a model system for studying co-evolution due to its perceived extreme specificity, but recent studies have reported a number of examples of trees pollinated by more than one fig wasp or sharing pollinators with other trees. This will make the potential of pollen flow between species and hybridization more likely though only few fig hybrids in nature have been found. We reared pollinator fig wasps from figs of 13 Chinese fig tree species and established their identity using genetic methods in order to investigate the extent to which they were supporting more than one species of pollinator (co-pollinator).
resultsOur results showed (1) pollinator sharing was frequent among closely-related dioecious species (where pollinator offspring and seeds develop on different trees); (2) that where two pollinator species were developing in figs of one host species there was usually one fig wasp with prominent rate than the other. An exception was F. triloba, where its two pollinators were equally abundant; (3) the extent of co-pollinator within one fig species is related to the dispersal ability of them which is stronger in dioecious figs, especially in small species.
conclusionsOur results gave more examples to the breakdown of extreme specificity, which suggest that host expansion events where pollinators reproduce in figs other than those of their usual hosts are not uncommon among fig wasps associated with dioecious hosts. Because closely related trees typically have closely related pollinators that have a very similar appearance, the extent of pollinator-sharing has probably been underestimated. Any pollinators that enter female figs carrying heterospecific pollen could potentially generate hybrid seed, and the extent of hybridization and its significance may also have been underestimated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.