Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34626256›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2022

CXCL13 in laboratory diagnosis of Lyme neuroborreliosis-the performance of the recomBead and ReaScan CXCL13 assays in human cerebrospinal fluid samples.

Sofie Haglund, Malin Lager, Paula Gyllemark, Gärda Andersson, Oskar Ekelund, Martin Sundqvist, Anna J Henningsson

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sofie HaglundDepartment of Laboratory Medicine in Jönköping, Region Jönköping County, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. sofie.haglund@rjl.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8696-9944
Malin LagerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine in Jönköping, Region Jönköping County, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9904-6898
Paula GyllemarkDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Region Jönköping County, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4915-564X
Gärda AnderssonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine in Jönköping, Region Jönköping County, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Oskar EkelundClinical Microbiology, Region Kronoberg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6621-0244
Martin SundqvistDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6532-2586
Anna J HenningssonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine in Jönköping, Region Jönköping County, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9315-8901
Linköping University · SEÖrebro University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chemokine CXCL13 is used as complement to serology in the diagnostics of Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB). We evaluated and compared the semi-quantitative, cassette-based ReaScan CXCL13 assay with the quantitative recomBead CXCL13 assay using a collection of 209 cerebrospinal fluid samples. The categorical agreement between results interpreted as negative, grey zone, and positive by the two methods was 87%. The diagnostic sensitivity was higher using the recomBead assay, whereas specificity was higher using ReaScan. Few manual steps, and a short turn-around time with no batching of samples makes the ReaScan CXCL13 assay an attractive complement to serology in the diagnostics of LNB.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChemokine CXCL13ChildChild, PreschoolClinical Laboratory TechniquesFemaleHumansImmunologic TestsLyme NeuroborreliosisMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultChemokine CXCL13CXCL13 protein, humanCXCL13DiagnosticsLyme neuroborreliosisReaScanrecomBead

Identifiers

PMID34626256
PMCPMC8732935
OpenAlexW3201790924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.