Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34626237›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2021

Use of pooled serum samples to assess herd disease status using commercially available ELISAs.

Juan Heberth Hernandez-Medrano, Luis Fernando Espinosa-Castillo, Ana D Rodriguez, Carlos G Gutierrez, Wendela Wapenaar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Switzerland-wideFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan Heberth Hernandez-MedranoDepartment of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico. juan.hernandez-medrano@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2907-2441
Luis Fernando Espinosa-CastilloDepartment of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ana D RodriguezDepartment of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
Carlos G GutierrezDepartment of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
Wendela WapenaarSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, LE12 6LJ, UK.

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia 247539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pooled samples are used in veterinary and human medicine as a cost-effective approach to monitor disease prevalence. Nonetheless, there is limited information on the effect of pooling on test performance, and research is required to determine the appropriate number of samples which can be pooled. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the use of pooled serum samples as a herd-level surveillance tool for infectious production-limiting diseases: bovine viral diarrhoea (BVD), infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR), enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) and Neospora caninum (NC), by investigating the maximum number of samples one can pool to identify one positive animal, using commercial antibody-detection ELISAs. Four positive field standards (PFS), one for each disease, were prepared by pooling highly positive herd-level samples diagnosed using commercially available ELISA tests. These PFS were used to simulate 18 pooled samples ranging from undiluted PFS to a dilution representing 1 positive in 1,000 animals using phosphate-buffered saline as diluent. A 1:10 dilution of the PFS resulted in positive results for IBR, BVD and EBL. Moreover, for IBR and BVD, results were still positive at 1:100 and 1:30 dilutions, respectively. However, for NC, a lower dilution (8:10) was required for a seropositive result. This study indicates that, at herd-level, the use of pooled serum is a useful strategy for monitoring infectious diseases (BVD, IBR and EBL) but not NC, using readily available diagnostic assays.

Indexed as

Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal DiseaseCattle DiseasesDiarrhea Viruses, Bovine ViralEnzootic Bovine LeukosisInfectious Bovine RhinotracheitisAnimalsCattleEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayBovine viral diarrhoea, BVDELISAEnzootic bovine leukosis, EBLInfectious bovine rhinotracheitis, IBRNeospora caninumPooled serum

Identifiers

PMID34626237
PMCPMC8502132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.