Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34626169›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2022

Prepregnancy adherence to plant-based diet indices and exploratory dietary patterns in relation to fecundability.

Shan Xuan Lim, See Ling Loy, Marjorelee T Colega, Jun Shi Lai, Keith M Godfrey, Yung Seng Lee, Kok Hian Tan, Fabian Yap, Lynette Pei-Chi Shek, Yap Seng Chong and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Shan Xuan LimSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
See Ling LoyDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9205-5580
Marjorelee T ColegaSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore.
Jun Shi LaiSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore.
Keith M GodfreyMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4643-0618
Yung Seng LeeSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-1253-0557
Kok Hian TanDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Fabian YapDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Lynette Pei-Chi ShekSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore.
Yap Seng ChongSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore.
Johan G ErikssonSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore.
Jerry Kok Yen ChanDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Shiao-Yng ChanSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore.
Mary Foong-Fong ChongSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGKK Women's and Children's Hospital · SGNanyang Technological University · SGNational Health Service · GBNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/15/17/31749Department of Health IS-BRC-1215-20004Department of Health NF-SI-0515-10042Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council MC_PC_21000Medical Research Council MC_PC_21001Medical Research Council MC_PC_21003Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModest associations have been reported between specific food groups or nutrients and fecundability [measured by time to pregnancy (TTP)]. Examining overall diets provides a more holistic approach towards understanding their associations with fecundability. It is not known whether plant-based diets indices or exploratory dietary patterns are associated with fecundability.

objectivesWe examine the associations between adherence to 1) plant-based diet indices; and 2) exploratory dietary patterns and fecundability among women planning pregnancy.

methodsData were analyzed from the Singapore Preconception Study of Long-Term Maternal and Child Outcomes (S-PRESTO) study. Prepregnancy diet was assessed using a semi-quantitative FFQ from which the overall, healthful, and unhealthful plant-based diet indices (oPDI, hPDI, and uPDI, respectively) were calculated. Exploratory dietary patterns were derived using factor analysis based on 44 predefined food groups. Participants were categorized into quintiles based on their dietary pattern scores. TTP (expressed in menstrual cycles) was ascertained within a year from the prepregnancy dietary assessment. Discrete-time proportional hazard models, adjusted for confounders, were used to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs) and 95% CIs, with FR > 1 indicating a shorter TTP.

resultsAmong 805 women, 383 pregnancies were confirmed by ultrasound scans. Compared with women in the lowest quintile, those in the highest quintile of the uPDI had reduced fecundability (FR of Q5 compared with Q1, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.91; P trend, 0.009). Conversely, greater adherence to the hPDI was associated with increased fecundability (1.46; 95% CI, 1.02-2.07; P trend, 0.036). The oPDI was not associated with fecundability. Among the 3 exploratory dietary patterns, only greater adherence to the Fast Food and Sweetened Beverages (FFSB) pattern was associated with reduced fecundability (0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.91; P trend, 0.018).

conclusionsGreater adherence to the uPDI or the FFSB dietary pattern was associated with reduced fecundability among Asian women. Greater adherence to the hPDI may be beneficial for fecundability, though this requires confirmation by future studies.

Indexed as

Diet, VegetarianMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdultDiet SurveysFeeding BehaviorFemaleFertilityHumansPregnancyPregnancy RateProspective StudiesSingaporedietary patternsdiet indicesfecundabilityplant-based dietpreconceptiontime-to-pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34626169
PMCPMC7612357
OpenAlexW3203509766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.