Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34625909›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2022

6q deletion is frequent but unrelated to patient prognosis in breast cancer.

Patrick Lebok, Hannah Bönte, Martina Kluth, Christina Möller-Koop, Isabell Witzel, Linn Wölber, Peter Paluchowski, Christian Wilke, Uwe Heilenkötter, Volkmar Müller and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 61% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick Lebok *Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Hannah Bönte *Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Martina KluthInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Christina Möller-KoopInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Isabell WitzelDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Linn WölberDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Peter PaluchowskiDepartment of Gynecology, Regio Clinic Pinneberg, Pinneberg, Germany.
Christian WilkeDepartment of Gynecology, Regio Clinic Elmshorn, Elmshorn, Germany.
Uwe HeilenkötterDepartment of Gynecology, Clinical Centre Itzehoe, Itzehoe, Germany.
Volkmar MüllerDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Barbara SchmalfeldtDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ronald SimonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. R.Simon@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0158-4258
Guido SauterInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Luigi TerraccianoDepartment of Pathology, Basel University Clinics, Basel, Switzerland.
Rainer Horst KrechInstitute of Pathology, Clinical Centre Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Albert von der AssenBreast Centre Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Eike BurandtInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DERegio Kliniken · DEHochschule Osnabrück · DEKlinikum Itzehoe · DEOsnabrück University · DEUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeletions involving the long arm of chromosome 6 have been reported to occur in breast cancer, but little is known about the clinical relevance of this alteration.

methodsWe made use of a pre-existing tissue microarray with 2197 breast cancers and employed a 6q15/centromere 6 dual-labeling probe for fluorescence in situ (FISH) analysis

resultsHeterozygous 6q15 deletions were found in 202 (18%) of 1099 interpretable cancers, including 19% of 804 cancers of no special type (NST), 3% of 29 lobular cancers, 7% of 41 cribriform cancers, and 28% of 18 cancers with papillary features. Homozygous deletions were not detected. In the largest subset of NST tumors, 6q15 deletions were significantly linked to advanced tumor stage and high grade (p < 0.0001 each). 6q deletions were also associated with estrogen receptor negativity (p = 0.0182), high Ki67 proliferation index (p < 0.0001), amplifications of HER2 (p = 0.0159), CCND1 (p = 0.0069), and cMYC (p = 0.0411), as well as deletions of PTEN (p = 0.0003), 8p21 (p < 0.0001), and 9p21 (p = 0.0179). However, 6q15 deletion was unrelated to patient survival in all cancers, in NST cancers, or in subsets of cancers defined by the presence or absence of lymph-node metastases.

conclusionOur data demonstrate that 6q deletion is a frequent event in breast cancer that is statistically linked to unfavorable tumor phenotype and features of genomic instability. The absence of any prognostic impact argues against a clinical applicability of 6q15 deletion testing in breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisPrognosis6q15 deletionBreast cancerGenomic alterationsPrognosisTMA

Identifiers

PMID34625909
PMCPMC8885507
OpenAlexW3203834970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.