ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
Comparative optimization of global solar radiation forecasting using machine learning and time series models.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Solar irradiation prediction using empirical and artificial intelligence methods: A comparative review.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Review
- A Review on Machine Learning Applications for Solar Plants.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing use of solar energy as a source of renewable energy has led to increasing the interest in photovoltaic (PV) power outputs forecasting. In the meantime, forecasting global solar radiation (GSR) depends heavily on weather conditions, which fluctuate over time. In this paper, an algorithm method is proposed, to choose the optimum machine learning techniques and time series models which minimizing the forecasting errors. The forecasted GSR belongs to the Faculty of Sciences, Abdelmake Eassadi University, Tetouan, Morocco. The selected machine learning and times series are Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Feed Forward Neural Network with Back Propagation (FFNN-BP), k-Nearest Neighbour (k-NN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) compared with persistence model as the reference model. To compare the results, several statistical metrics are calculated to evaluate the performance of each method. The obtained results indicated that the used machine learning and time series methods were more straightforward to implement. In particular, we find that the Feedforward neural network (FFNN) and ARIMA perform better and give good approximations with the corresponding GSR output.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34625894What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.