Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34625831›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hematology2022

Real-world survival of US patients with intermediate- to high-risk myelofibrosis: impact of ruxolitinib approval.

Srdan Verstovsek, Shreekant Parasuraman, Jingbo Yu, Anne Shah, Shambhavi Kumar, Ann Xi, Claire Harrison

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Emerging Therapeutic Approaches for Anemia in Myelofibrosis.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Prognostic and Predictive Models in Myelofibrosis.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Emerging Treatment Options for Myelofibrosis: Focus on Anemia.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Srdan VerstovsekDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson C39.8% were male. Among patients withancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. sverstov@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6912-8569
Shreekant ParasuramanIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Jingbo YuIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Anne ShahAvalere Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Shambhavi KumarAvalere Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Ann XiAvalere Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Claire HarrisonGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Prevea Health · USIncyte (United States) · USGuy's Hospital · GBThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Janus kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib is approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF) and improved overall survival (OS) versus control therapy in the phase 3 COMFORT trials. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to examine the real-world impact of ruxolitinib on OS in patients with MF. The US Medicare Fee-for-Service claims database (parts A/B/D) was used to identify patients with ≥ 1 inpatient or ≥ 2 outpatient claims with an MF diagnosis (January 2010-December 2017). Eligible patients with MF were ≥ 65 years old (intermediate-1 or higher risk based on age). Patients were divided into 3 groups based on ruxolitinib approval status at diagnosis and ruxolitinib exposure: (1) preapproval, ruxolitinib-unexposed; (2) post-approval, ruxolitinib-unexposed; and (3) post-approval, ruxolitinib-exposed. In total, 1677 patients with MF were included (preapproval [all ruxolitinib-unexposed], n = 278; post-approval, n = 1399 [ruxolitinib-unexposed, n = 1127; ruxolitinib-exposed, n = 272]). Overall, median age was 78 years, and 39.8% were male. Among patients with valid death dates (preapproval, n = 119 [42.8%]; post-approval, ruxolitinib-unexposed, n = 382 [33.9%]; post-approval ruxolitinib-exposed, n = 54 [19.9%]), 1-year survival rates were 55.6%, 72.5%, and 82.3%, and median OS was 13.2 months, 44.4 months, and not reached, respectively. Risk of mortality was significantly lower post- versus preapproval regardless of exposure to ruxolitinib (ruxolitinib-unexposed: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; ruxolitinib-exposed: adjusted HR, 0.36; P < 0.001 for both); post-approval, mortality risk was significantly lower in ruxolitinib-exposed versus ruxolitinib-unexposed patients (adjusted HR, 0.61; P = 0.002). Findings from this study complement clinical data of ruxolitinib in MF by demonstrating a survival benefit in a real-world setting.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansJanus KinasesMaleNitrilesPrimary MyelofibrosisProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesPyrimidinesRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisUnited StatesJanus KinasesNitrilesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinibMedicare Fee-for-Service; Myelofibrosis; Real world; Ruxolitinib; Survival

Identifiers

PMID34625831
PMCPMC8720739
OpenAlexW3204850429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.