ArticleAnnals of hematology2022
Real-world survival of US patients with intermediate- to high-risk myelofibrosis: impact of ruxolitinib approval.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Health Care Utilization Databases obtained from health system inform outcome for ruxolitinib treatment in patients with myelofibrosis.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Patient-reported outcomes regarding the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasias.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Machine learning identifies inflammation-related diagnostic biomarkers for primary myelofibrosis with clinical validation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Increased Rate of Anemia and Discontinuation in Older Patients with Myelofibrosis Treated with Ruxolitinib.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Emerging Therapeutic Approaches for Anemia in Myelofibrosis.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2025Review
- Malignant JAK-signaling: at the interface of inflammation and malignant transformation.Leukemia · 2025Review
- Article
- Decision analysis for transplant candidates with primary myelofibrosis in the ruxolitinib era.Haematologica · 2024Article
- Treatment Strategies Used in Treating Myelofibrosis: State of the Art.Hematology reports · 2024Review
- Prognostic and Predictive Models in Myelofibrosis.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2024Review
- A novel application of XPO1 inhibition for the treatment of myelofibrosis.Blood neoplasia · 2024Review
- Management of Patients with Early Myelofibrosis: A Discussion of Best Practices.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2024Review
- Review
- A Prognostic Model to Predict Ruxolitinib Discontinuation and Death in Patients with Myelofibrosis.Cancers · 2023Article
- Article
- Association of Myelofibrosis Phenotypes with Clinical Manifestations, Molecular Profiles, and Treatments.Cancers · 2023Review
- SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Novel Therapeutic Strategies in Development for Myelofibrosis.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2023Review
- Article
- Emerging Treatment Options for Myelofibrosis: Focus on Anemia.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Janus kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib is approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF) and improved overall survival (OS) versus control therapy in the phase 3 COMFORT trials. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to examine the real-world impact of ruxolitinib on OS in patients with MF. The US Medicare Fee-for-Service claims database (parts A/B/D) was used to identify patients with ≥ 1 inpatient or ≥ 2 outpatient claims with an MF diagnosis (January 2010-December 2017). Eligible patients with MF were ≥ 65 years old (intermediate-1 or higher risk based on age). Patients were divided into 3 groups based on ruxolitinib approval status at diagnosis and ruxolitinib exposure: (1) preapproval, ruxolitinib-unexposed; (2) post-approval, ruxolitinib-unexposed; and (3) post-approval, ruxolitinib-exposed. In total, 1677 patients with MF were included (preapproval [all ruxolitinib-unexposed], n = 278; post-approval, n = 1399 [ruxolitinib-unexposed, n = 1127; ruxolitinib-exposed, n = 272]). Overall, median age was 78 years, and 39.8% were male. Among patients with valid death dates (preapproval, n = 119 [42.8%]; post-approval, ruxolitinib-unexposed, n = 382 [33.9%]; post-approval ruxolitinib-exposed, n = 54 [19.9%]), 1-year survival rates were 55.6%, 72.5%, and 82.3%, and median OS was 13.2 months, 44.4 months, and not reached, respectively. Risk of mortality was significantly lower post- versus preapproval regardless of exposure to ruxolitinib (ruxolitinib-unexposed: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; ruxolitinib-exposed: adjusted HR, 0.36; P < 0.001 for both); post-approval, mortality risk was significantly lower in ruxolitinib-exposed versus ruxolitinib-unexposed patients (adjusted HR, 0.61; P = 0.002). Findings from this study complement clinical data of ruxolitinib in MF by demonstrating a survival benefit in a real-world setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.