ArticleScientific reports2021
Robust and universal predictive models for frictional pressure drop during two-phase flow in smooth helically coiled tube heat exchangers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliable smart models for estimating frictional pressure drop in two-phase condensation through smooth channels of varying sizes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Numerical and experimental investigation of heat transfer enhancement in double tube heat exchanger using nail rod inserts.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Intelligent modeling of hydrogen sulfide solubility in various types of single and multicomponent solvents.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a lack of well-verified models in the literature for the prediction of the frictional pressure drop (FPD) in the helically coiled tubes at different conditions/orientations. In this study, the robust and universal models for estimating two-phase FPD in smooth coiled tubes with different orientations were developed using several intelligent approaches. For this reason, a databank comprising 1267 experimental data samples was collected from 12 independent studies, which covers a broad range of fluids, tube diameters, coil diameters, coil axis inclinations, mass fluxes, saturation temperatures, and vapor qualities. The earlier models for straight and coiled tubes were examined using the collected database, which showed absolute average relative error (AARE) higher than 21%. The most relevant dimensionless groups were used as models' inputs, and the neural network approach of multilayer perceptron and radial basis functions (RBF) were developed based on the homogenous equilibrium method. Although both intelligent models exhibited excellent accuracy, the RBF model predicted the best results with AARE 4.73% for the testing process. In addition, an explicit FPD model was developed by the genetic programming (GP), which showed the AARE of 14.97% for all data points. Capabilities of the proposed models under different conditions were described and, the sensitivity analyses were performed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.