Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34625614›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Predicting cognitive impairment in outpatients with epilepsy using machine learning techniques.

Feng Lin, Jiarui Han, Teng Xue, Jilan Lin, Shenggen Chen, Chaofeng Zhu, Han Lin, Xianyang Chen, Wanhui Lin, Huapin Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Feng LinDepartment of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Jiarui HanBaoFeng Key Laboratory of Genetics and Metabolism, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Teng XueZhongguancun Biological and Medical Big Data Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jilan LinDepartment of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Shenggen ChenDepartment of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Chaofeng ZhuDepartment of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Han LinDepartment of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Xianyang ChenBaoFeng Key Laboratory of Genetics and Metabolism, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wanhui LinDepartment of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, People's Republic of China. xiaofeige9903399@126.com.
Huapin HuangDepartment of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, People's Republic of China. hh-p@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies report predictions for cognitive function but there are few predictions in epileptic patients; therefore, we established a workflow to efficiently predict outcomes of both the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in outpatients with epilepsy. Data from 441 outpatients with epilepsy were included; of these, 433 patients met the 12 clinical characteristic criteria and were divided into training (n = 304) and experimental (n = 129) groups. After descriptive statistics were analyzed, cross-validation was used to select the optimal model. The random forest (RF) algorithm was combined with the redundancy analysis (RDA) algorithm; then, optimal feature selection and resampling were carried out after removing linear redundancy information. The features that contributed more to multiple outcomes were selected. Finally, the external traceability of the model was evaluated using the follow-up data. The RF algorithm was the best prediction model for both MMSE and MoCA outcomes. Finally, seven markers were screened by overlapping the top ten important features for MMSE ranked by RF modeling, those ranked for MoCA ranked by RF modeling, and those for both assessments ranked by RDA. The optimal combination of features were namely, sex, age, age of onset, seizure frequency, brain MRI abnormalities, epileptiform discharge in EEG and usage of drugs. which was the most efficient in predicting outcomes of MMSE, MoCA, and both assessments.

Indexed as

EpilepsyMachine LearningAdultBiomarkersBrainCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsOutpatientsPrognosisRisk FactorsSeizuresTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID34625614
PMCPMC8501137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.