ArticleScientific reports2021
BRAF mutations may identify a clinically distinct subset of glioblastoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Phase 1/2 Study of Disulfiram and Copper With Concurrent Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2024Trial
- BRAF-amplified glioblastoma patients have a worse prognosis than those with BRAF mutation and are associated with amplification of MET, RHEB and CUL1.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Characterization of the mutational status of glioblastoma and high-grade astrocytomas in a Latin American cohort.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Molecular Biomarkers of Glioma.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Clinicopathological analysis of BRAF and non-BRAF MAPK pathway-altered gliomas in paediatric and adult patients: a single-institution study of 40 patients.Journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- BRAF-mutated suprasellar glioblastoma mimicking craniopharyngioma: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024Article
- Machine learning to improve interpretability of clinical, radiological and panel-based genomic data of glioma grade 4 patients undergoing surgical resection.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Targeting the neural stem cells in subventricular zone for the treatment of glioblastoma: an update from preclinical evidence to clinical interventions.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Review
- Integrated molecular and clinical analysis of BRAF-mutant glioma in adults.NPJ precision oncology · 2023Article
- Molecular Heterogeneity in BRAF-Mutant Gliomas: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Implications.Cancers · 2023Review
- New Directions in the Therapy of Glioblastoma.Cancers · 2022Review
- The clinical characteristics and outcomes of incidentally discovered glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- Effectiveness and safety of tumor-treating fields therapy for glioblastoma: A single-center study in a Chinese cohort.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Prediction of BRAF mutation status in glioblastoma multiforme by preoperative ring enhancement appearances on MRI.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Prior studies examining the mutational landscape of GBM revealed recurrent alterations in genes that regulate the same growth control pathways. To this regard, ~ 40% of GBM harbor EGFR alterations, whereas BRAF variants are rare. Existing data suggests that gain-of-function mutations in these genes are mutually exclusive. This study was designed to explore the clinical, pathological, and molecular differences between EGFR- and BRAF-mutated GBM. We reviewed retrospective clinical data from 89 GBM patients referred for molecular testing between November 2012 and December 2015. Differences in tumor mutational profile, location, histology, and survival outcomes were compared in patients with EGFR- versus BRAF-mutated tumors, and microarray data from The Cancer Genome Atlas was used to assess differential gene expression between the groups. Individuals with BRAF-mutant tumors were typically younger and survived longer relative to those with EGFR-mutant tumors, even in the absence of targeted treatments. BRAF-mutant tumors lacked distinct histomorphology but exhibited unique localization in the brain, typically arising adjacent to the lateral ventricles. Compared to EGFR- and IDH1-mutant tumors, BRAF-mutant tumors showed increased expression of genes related to a trophoblast-like phenotype, specifically HLA-G and pregnancy specific glycoproteins, that have been implicated in invasion and immune evasion. Taken together, these observations suggest a distinct clinical presentation, brain location, and gene expression profile for BRAF-mutant tumors. Pending further study, this may prove useful in the stratification and management of GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.