Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34625480›Full record

Trial reportThe European respiratory journal2022

Use of Singing for Lung Health as an alternative training modality within pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD: a randomised controlled trial.

Mette Kaasgaard, Daniel Bech Rasmussen, Karen Hjerrild Andreasson, Ole Hilberg, Anders Løkke, Peter Vuust, Uffe Bodtger

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The European respiratory journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03280355 nacompletednot on this map

The Effects of Singing Training for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2017 to 2019Enrolled270ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsSinging training, Physical Training
NCT05720780 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Can Rehabilitation Training With Music-support Increase Exercise Tolerance in Individuals With COPD and CRF Compared to Rehabilitation Training Alone? A Randomized Control Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpARan2023 to 2027Enrolled156ConditionsCOPDArmsMS group, C group
NCT07460999 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects and Mechanisms of Online Delivered Singing Training vs Usual Care in Patients With Persistent Symptoms 6-18 Months After Surgical Resection for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) - a Multi-centre RCT

TypeinterventionalSponsorZealand University HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Chronic Obstructive Lung DiseaseArmsSinging training (Singing for Lung Health (SLH)), Control group: Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of Singing on Symptoms in Stable COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Singing for adults with chronic respiratory disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A hybrid in-person and online group singing program for older adults with breathing limitations: A pilot mixed-methods study.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mette KaasgaardPulmonary Research Unit Region Zealand (PLUZ), Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark mk@clin.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-3833-2943
Daniel Bech RasmussenPulmonary Research Unit Region Zealand (PLUZ), Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1213-9483
Karen Hjerrild AndreassonPulmonary Research Unit Region Zealand (PLUZ), Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8752-9614
Ole HilbergDept of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3075-3463
Anders LøkkeDept of Respiratory Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6905-4141
Peter VuustDept of Clinical Medicine, Center for Music in the Brain, Aarhus University, Denmark and the Royal Academy of Music, Aarhus/Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4908-735X
Uffe BodtgerPulmonary Research Unit Region Zealand (PLUZ), Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1231-9209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a cornerstone in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. However, PR adherence is generally low, and barriers include availability, economic issues, motivation and an inability to attend or perform physical training. Therefore, alternative, evidence-based PR activities are required. Singing may have benefits for quality of life (QoL), respiratory control and well-being in COPD, but the impact on the PR key outcome, physical exercise capacity, is uncertain.

methodsIn this randomised controlled trial (NCT03280355), we investigated the effectiveness of 10 weeks of PR, including either "Singing for Lung Health" (SLH) training or standard physical exercise training (PExT). The primary outcome was a change in exercise capacity (6-min walk distance (6MWD)) from baseline to post-PR. Secondary outcomes were changes in QoL (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS), lung function, dyspnoea and adherence.

resultsWe included 270 COPD patients, and 195 completed the study. Demographics across groups were comparable, and both groups improved significantly in 6MWD and SGRQ score. SLH was non-inferior to PExT in improving 6MWD (mean±sd 13.1±36.3 m

conclusionOur study suggests that SLH is non-inferior to PExT in improving 6MWD during a 10-week PR programme. Future studies addressing reproducibility, long-term effects and health economics are needed.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSingingDyspneaExercise ToleranceHumansLungQuality of LifeReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID34625480
PMCPMC9117735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.