Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34625456›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2021

Community-level impacts of sanitation coverage on maternal and neonatal health: a retrospective cohort of survey data.

Brittany L Kmush, Bhavneet Walia, Anushruta Neupane, Carolina Frances, Idris Ahmed Mohamed, Mahwish Iqbal, David A Larsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brittany L KmushDepartment of Public Health, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA blkmush@syr.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2143-7554
Bhavneet WaliaDepartment of Public Health, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Anushruta NeupaneDepartment of Public Health, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Carolina FrancesDepartment of Public Health, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Idris Ahmed MohamedDepartment of Public Health, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Mahwish IqbalDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
David A LarsenDepartment of Public Health, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Syracuse University · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccess to sanitation facilities (toilets or latrines) greatly improves human health. Low community sanitation coverage may lead to increased exposure to pathogens for households both with and without a sanitation facility.

methodsWe created a retrospective cohort using Demographic and Health Surveys from 1990 through 2018. Using regression with matched women as a random intercept, we assessed the association between community-level sanitation coverage and neonatal mortality (Poisson model,

resultsAmong women with household sanitation, the incidence of neonatal death (incidence rate ratio: 0.85, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.93), the odds of small birth size (OR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.87) and anaemia (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.85) were lower for women in communities with 100% sanitation coverage compared with 1%-30% (p≤0.001 for all). There was no difference in neonatal deaths between women in communities with 31%-99% sanitation coverage compared with 1%-30% (p≥0.05). Among women without household sanitation, there were no differences in neonatal mortality by community sanitation (p≥0.05). The odds of small birth size were decreased (OR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97, p=0.003) for women in communities with 61%-99% sanitation coverage compared with 1%-30%; there was no association with the other community sanitation categories (p≥0.05). The odds of anaemia were increased (OR: 1.08, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.11, p<0.001) for women living in communities with 0% sanitation coverage compared with 1%-30%, but no association with the other community sanitation categories (p≥0.05).

conclusionCommunity sanitation coverage is associated with improved maternal and neonatal outcomes, particularly among women with household sanitation. This suggests that the impact of sanitation coverage on maternal and neonatal health is underestimated unless the community-level effects are considered.

Indexed as

Infant HealthSanitationFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaireshygienematernal health

Identifiers

PMID34625456
PMCPMC8504178
OpenAlexW3201974819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.