Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34625348›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2021

Is it time to put rest to rest?

Emily S Finn

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed
20.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 257 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Temporal stability of functional network configurations and its relationship to cognition and psychopathology in early psychoses.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily S FinnDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Electronic address: emily.s.finn@dartmouth.edu.
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

Linking brain activity during naturalistic tasks to individual phenotypes on the depression spectrumR00MH120257 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI FINN, EMILY SUZANNE · 2020 to 2022
$747k
NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH120257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The so-called resting state, in which participants lie quietly with no particular inputs or outputs, represented a paradigm shift from conventional task-based studies in human neuroimaging. Our foray into rest was fruitful from both a scientific and methodological perspective, but at this point, how much more can we learn from rest on its own? While rest still dominates in many subfields, data from tasks have empirically demonstrated benefits, as well as the potential to provide insights about the mind in addition to the brain. I argue that we can accelerate progress in human neuroscience by de-emphasizing rest in favor of more grounded experiments, including promising integrated designs that respect the prominence of self-generated activity while offering enhanced control and interpretability.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeurosciencesBrainBrain MappingHumansNeural PathwaysNeuroimagingbrain–behavior predictionfunctional connectivitynaturalistic tasksresting statetask-based

Identifiers

PMID34625348
PMCPMC8585722
OpenAlexW3204867366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.