Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34625318›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance abuse treatment2022

Spatial proximity and access to buprenorphine or methadone treatment for opioid use disorder in a sample of people misusing opioids in Southern California.

P J Davidson, J M Bowles, M Faul, T L Gaines

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 'I'm on the coast and I'm on methadone': A qualitative study examining access to opioid agonist treatment in rural and coastal British Columbia.Canadian journal of rural medicine : the official journal of the Society of Rural Physicians of Canada = Journal canadien de la medecine rurale : le journal officiel de la Societe de medecine rurale du Canada · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P J DavidsonUniversity of California, San Diego, Department of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093-0507, USA. Electronic address: pdavidson@ucsd.edu.
J M BowlesUniversity of California, San Diego, Department of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093-0507, USA; Centre on Drug Policy Evaluation, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria St., Toronto, Ontario M5B 3M6, Canada.
M FaulHealth Systems and Trauma Systems Branch, Mailstop F-62, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
T L GainesUniversity of California, San Diego, Department of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093-0507, USA.

Funding

UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR001442 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S, HOGARTH, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2024
$88.3M
VirologyP30AI036214 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Maile Ann Young Karris · 1994 to 2026
$78.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001442NCIPC CDC HHS U01 CE002778NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI036214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to the opioid crisis, over the last 10 years substantial strides have been made to increase the availability of evidence-based treatments for opioid use disorder, in particular buprenorphine maintenance, in the United States. Despite these worthwhile efforts, uptake rates of evidence-based treatment remain relatively low. As part of a broader study of opioid misuse, we examined proximity to evidence-based treatment as a potential barrier to treatment access.

methodsIn 2017-2018, we surveyed 218 individuals misusing prescription opioids or using street opioids in three Southern Californian counties. The study calculated driving distance from place of residence to the closest treatment provider offering buprenorphine or methadone treatment for opioid use disorders.

resultsMedian distance to providers was 3.8 km (2.4 miles). Seventy one (33%) participants had received some form of treatment in the last 3 months; however, only 26 (40%) of these had received buprenorphine or methadone maintenance treatment. Participants receiving treatment at the time of their interview were traveling an average 16.8 km (10.4 miles) to reach treatment, indicating that as a group this population was both willing and able to seek and engage with treatment.

conclusionsIn the suburban and exurban communities in which our study was based, our findings suggest that simple physical proximity to providers of evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder is no longer a critical barrier. Other barriers to uptake of buprenorphine or methadone maintenance treatment clearly remain and need to be addressed. DISCLAIMER: Findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidHumansMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneBuprenorphineMethadoneOpioidsSouthern CaliforniaSpatial proximityTreatment for opioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID34625318
PMCPMC10465062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.