ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2023
Ex vivo biomechanical analysis of the Ross procedure using the modified inclusion technique in a 3-dimensionally printed left heart simulator.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Open Jacket Ross: Initial description and ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of neosinus openings in the pulmonary autograft inclusion jacket.JTCVS techniques · 2026Article
- Design and evaluation of valve interventions using ex vivo biomechanical modeling: the Stanford experience.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Review
- A Novel 3-Dimensional Reinforced Ringed Graft for Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement.JACC. Asia · 2025Article
- Biomechanical engineering analysis of neochordae length's impact on chordal forces in mitral repair.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024Article
- Biomechanics and clinical outcomes of various conduit configurations in valve sparing aortic root replacement.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Article
- Beating heart pulmonary autograft harvest and modified inclusion technique with anti-commissural plication for the Ross procedure.JTCVS techniques · 2023Article
- Biomechanical Engineering Analysis of Pulmonary Valve Leaflet Hemodynamics and Kinematics in the Ross Procedure.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2023Article
- A Novel Device for Intraoperative Direct Visualization of a Pressurized Root in Aortic Valve Repair.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe inclusion technique was developed to reinforce the pulmonary autograft to prevent dilation after the Ross procedure. Anticommissural plication (ACP), a modification technique, can reduce graft size and create neosinuses. The objective was to evaluate pulmonary valve biomechanics using the inclusion technique in the Ross procedure with and without ACP.
methodsSeven porcine and 5 human pulmonary autografts were harvested from hearts obtained from a meat abattoir and from heart transplant recipients and donors, respectively. Five additional porcine autografts without reinforcement were used as controls. The Ross procedure was performed using the inclusion technique with a straight polyethylene terephthalate graft. The same specimens were tested both with and without ACP. Hemodynamic parameter data, echocardiography, and high-speed videography were collected via the ex vivo heart simulator.
resultsPorcine autograft regurgitation was significantly lower after the use of inclusion technique compared with controls (P < .01). ACP compared with non-ACP in both porcine and human pulmonary autografts was associated with lower leaflet rapid opening velocity (3.9 ± 2.4 cm/sec vs 5.9 ± 2.4 cm/sec; P = .03; 3.5 ± 0.9 cm/sec vs 4.4 ± 1.0 cm/sec; P = .01), rapid closing velocity (1.9 ± 1.6 cm/sec vs 3.1 ± 2.0 cm/sec; P = .01; 1.8 ± 0.7 cm/sec vs 2.2 ± 0.3 cm/sec; P = .13), relative rapid opening force (4.6 ± 3.0 vs 7.7 ± 5.2; P = .03; 3.0 ± 0.6 vs 4.0 ± 2.1; P = .30), and relative rapid closing force (2.5 ± 3.4 vs 5.9 ± 2.3; P = .17; 1.4 ± 1.3 vs 2.3 ± 0.6; P = .25).
conclusionsThe Ross procedure using the inclusion technique demonstrated excellent hemodynamic parameter results. The ACP technique was associated with more favorable leaflet biomechanics. In vivo validation should be performed to allow direct translation to clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.