Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34625211›Full record

Trial reportJournal of school psychology2021

Playing the long game: A multivariate multilevel non-linear growth curve model of long-term effects in a randomized trial of the Good Behavior Game.

Patricio Troncoso, Neil Humphrey

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of school psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Good Behavior Game as a Universal Preventive Intervention: a Systematic Review of its Long-Term Effects.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Competition Matters!Experimental psychology · 2025
    Trial
  4. Promoting 21st Century Health and Wellness Skills in Elementary School Children: a Group Randomized Trial.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Oppositional defiant disorder.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patricio TroncosoInstitute for Social Policy, Housing and Equalities Research (I-SPHERE), Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh Campus, Scotland EH14 4AS, United Kingdom; Manchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom. Electronic address: p.troncoso@hw.ac.uk.
Neil HumphreyManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of Health 14/52/38
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) examined the impact of the Good Behavior Game (GBG) on children's developmental trajectories of disruptive behavior, concentration problems, and prosocial behavior from middle childhood (ages 6-7 years) to early adolescence (ages 10-11 years). Seventy-seven schools in England were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. Allocation was balanced by school size and the proportion of children eligible for free school meals. Children (N = 3084) ages 6-7 years at baseline were the target cohort. Outcome measures, assessed via the Teacher Observation of Child Adaptation Checklist, were taken prior to randomization (baseline - Time 1) and annually for the next 4 years (Time 2 to Time 5). During the 2-year main trial period (Time 1 to Time 3), teachers of this cohort in intervention schools implemented the GBG, whereas their counterparts in the control group continued their usual practice. A multivariate multilevel non-linear growth curve model indicated that the GBG reduced concentration problems over time. In addition, the model also revealed that the intervention improved prosocial behavior among at-risk children (e.g., those with elevated symptoms of conduct problems at Time 1, n = 485). No intervention effects were unequivocally found in relation to disruptive behavior. These findings are discussed in relation to the extant literature, strengths and limitations are noted, and practical and methodological implications are highlighted.

Indexed as

Problem BehaviorSchoolsAdolescentChildChild BehaviorHumansMultilevel AnalysisBayes factorBehavior managementGrowth curveInterventionMultilvariate multilevel modelingRandomized trial

Identifiers

PMID34625211
PMCPMC8519394
OpenAlexW3201191577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.