Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34624755›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2021

Development of a novel nomogram-based online tool to predict axillary status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cN+ breast cancer: A multicentre study on 1,950 patients.

Fabio Corsi, Sara Albasini, Luca Sorrentino, Giulia Armatura, Claudia Carolla, Corrado Chiappa, Francesca Combi, Annalisa Curcio, Angelica Della Valle, Guglielmo Ferrari and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabio CorsiBreast Unit, Department of Surgery, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco", Università di Milano, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: fabio.corsi@unimi.it.
Sara AlbasiniBreast Unit, Department of Surgery, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Luca SorrentinoDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco", Università di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Giulia ArmaturaChirurgia Generale, Ospedale Centrale di Bolzano, Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige, Italy.
Claudia CarollaBreast Unit, Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Corrado ChiappaSSD Breast Unit, ASST-Settelaghi di Varese, Italy.
Francesca CombiBreast Unit Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Modena, Italy.
Annalisa CurcioChirurgia Senologica, Ospedale Morgagni Pierantoni, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Angelica Della ValleBreast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Guglielmo FerrariBreast Surgery Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Maria Luisa GasparriService of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
Oreste GentiliniBreast Surgery, San Raffaele University and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy.
Matteo GhilliBreast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of Pisa, Italy.
Chiara ListortiBreast Unit, Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Stefano ManciniBreast Surgery, Department of Surgery, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milano, Italy.
Peter MarinelloChirurgia Generale, Ospedale Centrale di Bolzano, Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige, Italy.
Francesco MeaniService of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, Lugano, Switzerland.
Simone MeleBreast Surgery Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Anna PertusatiGeneral Surgery I, Department of Surgery, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milano, Italy.
Manuela RoncellaBreast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of Pisa, Italy.
Francesca RoveraSSD Breast Unit, ASST-Settelaghi di Varese, Italy.
Adele SgarellaBreast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Giovanni TazzioliBreast Unit Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Modena, Italy.
Daniela TognaliChirurgia Senologica, Ospedale Morgagni Pierantoni, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Secondo FolliBreast Unit, Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena · ITAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITLuigi Sacco Hospital · ITOspedale di Bolzano · ITOspedale G.B. Morgagni - L.Pierantoni · ITOspedale regionale di Lugano · CHIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITSan Raffaele University of Rome · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType of axillary surgery in breast cancer (BC) patients who convert from cN + to ycN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is still debated. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a preoperative predictive nomogram to select those patients with a low risk of residual axillary disease after NAC, in whom axillary surgery could be minimized. PATIENTS AND

methods1950 clinically node-positive BC patients from 11 Breast Units, treated by NAC and subsequent surgery, were included from 2005 to 2020. Patients were divided in two groups: those who achieved nodal pCR vs. those with residual nodal disease after NAC. The cohort was divided into training and validation set with a geographic separation criterion. The outcome was to identify independent predictors of axillary pathologic complete response (pCR).

resultsIndependent predictive factors associated to nodal pCR were axillary clinical complete response (cCR) after NAC (OR 3.11, p < 0.0001), ER-/HER2+ (OR 3.26, p < 0.0001) or ER+/HER2+ (OR 2.26, p = 0.0002) or ER-/HER2- (OR 1.89, p = 0.009) BC, breast cCR (OR 2.48, p < 0.0001), Ki67 > 14% (OR 0.52, p = 0.0005), and tumor grading G2 (OR 0.35, p = 0.002) or G3 (OR 0.29, p = 0.0003). The nomogram showed a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 73% (AUC 0.77, 95%CI 0.75-0.80). After external validation the accuracy of the nomogram was confirmed.

conclusionThe accuracy makes this freely-available, nomogram-based online tool useful to predict nodal pCR after NAC, translating the concept of tailored axillary surgery also in this setting of patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyAxillaChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansLymph NodesMastectomyNomogramsSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAxillary dissectionAxillary surgeryBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapySentinel node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID34624755
PMCPMC8503563
OpenAlexW3202649712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.