Observational studyResuscitation2021
Pulse oximetry waveform: A non-invasive physiological predictor for the return of spontaneous circulation in cardiac arrest patients ---- A multicenter, prospective observational study.
Observational study in Resuscitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and preliminary validation of an explainable machine learning model for early ROSC detection during chest compression in a swine model of cardiac arrest.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Key physiological indicators and technological trends in physiology-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A narrative review.Resuscitation plus · 2026Review
- Non-invasive Monitor of Effective Chest Compressions with Carotid and Femoral Artery Ultrasound in the Emergency Department.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Manual vs. Mechanical Ventilation in Respiratory Parameters of intubated Patients During cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; a Randomized Clinical Trial.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of grey-white matter ratio obtained within two hours after return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors: A multicenter, observational study.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- A novel predictor of unsustained return of spontaneous circulation in cardiac arrest patients through a combination of capnography and pulse oximetry: a multicenter observational study.World journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Prediction of Return of Spontaneous Circulation in a Pediatric Swine Model of Cardiac Arrest Using Low-Resolution Multimodal Physiological Waveforms.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2023Article
- Pulse oximetry plethysmography: A new approach for physiology-directed CPR?Resuscitation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
42 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the predictive value of pulse oximetry plethysmography (POP) for the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in cardiac arrest (CA) patients.
methodsThis was a multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with cardiac arrest at 14 teaching hospitals cross China from December 2013 through November 2014. The study endpoint was ROSC, defined as the restoration of a palpable pulse and an autonomous cardiac rhythm lasting for at least 20 minutes after the completion or cessation of CPR.
results150 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients and 291 in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) patients were enrolled prospectively. ROSC was achieved in 20 (13.3%) and 64 (22.0%) patients in these cohorts, respectively. In patients with complete end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO
conclusionPOP may be a novel and effective method for predicting ROSC during resuscitation, with a prognostic value similar to ETCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.