Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34624069›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

What predicts the knowledge of breastfeeding practices among late adolescent girls? evidence from a cross-sectional analysis.

Pradeep Kumar, Prem Shankar Mishra, Shobhit Srivastava, Debashree Sinha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pradeep KumarDepartment of Mathematical Demography & Statistics, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Prem Shankar MishraDepartment of Population Research Centre, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Shobhit SrivastavaDepartment of Mathematical Demography & Statistics, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7138-4916
Debashree SinhaDepartment of Development Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2741-0021
International Institute for Population Sciences · INInstitute for Social and Economic Change · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreastfeeding is one of the most effective ways to ensure infant health and survival. Inadequate breastfeeding practices, and knowledge among adolescent mothers have led to unprecedented infant and child morbidity and mortality. Given, the high global prevalence of adolescent mothers it is imperative to understand how the knowledge of breastfeeding practices operates among adolescent girls across different socio-economic settings. MATERIALS &

methodsData was carried out from Understanding the Lives of Adolescents and Young Adults (UDAYA) survey, conducted in 2015-16. Descriptive statistics along with bivariate analysis was done to examine the preliminary results. For analysing the association between the binary outcome variable and other explanatory variables, binary logistic regression method was used. The explanatory variables were educational status of the respondent, media exposure, working status, ever pregnant status (only for married adolescent girls), sex and age of the household head, educational status of the head of the household, caste, religion, wealth index, residence and states.

resultsAbout 42%, 50%, and 42% of married adolescent girls had knowledge of immediate breastfeeding, yellowish milk, and exclusive breastfeeding respectively. The odds of knowledge about immediate breastfeeding [married-AOR: 1.57; CI: 1.09-2.28 and unmarried-AOR: 1.30; CI: 1.08-1.55], yellowish milk feeding [married-AOR: 2.09; CI: 1.46-3.01 and unmarried-AOR: 1.39; CI: 1.17-1.66], and exclusive breastfeeding [married-AOR: 1.74; CI: 1.2-2.52 and unmarried-AOR: 1.46; CI: 1.22-1.76] were significantly more among adolescent girls aged 19 years old compared to 15 years old girls. Adolescent married and unmarried girls with 10 & above years of schooling were 1.82 times [AOR: 1.82; CI: 1.52-2.18] and 2.69 times [AOR: 2.69; CI: 2.08-3.47] more likely to have knowledge about immediate breastfeeding, 1.74 times [AOR: 1.74; CI: 1.45-2.09] and 2.10 times [AOR: 2.10; CI: 1.68-2.62] more likely to have knowledge about yellowish milk feeding, and 3.13 times [AOR: 3.13; CI: 2.6-3.78] and 3.87 times [AOR: 3.87; CI: 2.95-5.08] more likely to have knowledge about exclusive breastfeeding respectively than girls with no schooling.

conclusionBreastfeeding practices and interpersonal counselling from elders in the household should be encouraged. Ongoing breastfeeding promotion programs of the government should promote high education of adolescent girls. Mass media interventions should be encouraged.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingKnowledgeAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMarriageYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34624069
PMCPMC8500419
OpenAlexW3203515620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.